Countries citing papers authored by John Stonehouse
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John Stonehouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stonehouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stonehouse more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stonehouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stonehouse. The network helps show where John Stonehouse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Stonehouse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Stonehouse.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Stonehouse based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Stonehouse. John Stonehouse is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Singh, Hari Shankar, Abraham Verghese, John Stonehouse, et al.. (2008). Developing bait and lure-based integrated pest management module for mango fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis) management in Orissa. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 78(7). 609–613.3 indexed citations
Krishnamurthy, S. V., et al.. (2006). AN ASSESSMENT OF METHYL EUGENOL DISPENSERS AND FRUIT FLY SPECIES COMPLEX IN ORCHARD AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS OF GOA, INDIA. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems. 12(2). 161–163.2 indexed citations
4.
Verghese, Abraham, et al.. (2005). LABORATORY AND FIELD EFFECTIVENESS OF FRUIT FLY - BAITS IN EASTERN UTTAR PRADESH. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems. 11(2).
5.
Stonehouse, John & Abraham Verghese. (2005). THE SELECTION AND PRESENTATION OF VARIABLES IN FRUIT FLY IPM RESEARCH. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems. 11(2).1 indexed citations
6.
Verghese, Abraham, et al.. (2005). LABORATORY AND FIELD EFFECTIVENESS OF FRUIT FLY BAITS IN SOUTHERN KERALA. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems. 11(2).
Verghese, Abraham, et al.. (2004). Fruit flies of economic significance in India, with special reference to Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel).. 317–324.30 indexed citations
9.
Boa, E., Jeffery W. Bentley, & John Stonehouse. (2001). Special report. Economic Botany. 55(3). 363–369.5 indexed citations
10.
Mahmood, Riaz, et al.. (2000). Fruit flies in Pakistan: damage and control in farmers' fields.. 83–85.1 indexed citations
11.
Mahmood, Riaz, et al.. (2000). Laboratory and field tests of home-made baits of animal protein.. 2000. 93–96.1 indexed citations
12.
Stonehouse, John, et al.. (2000). The Melon Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae in the Republic of Seychelles: status and prospects as of 8/5/2000.. 211–213.1 indexed citations
13.
Price, N. S., et al.. (2000). Quarantine pest risk analysis of fruit flies in the Indian Ocean: the case of Bactrocera zonata.. 179–183.8 indexed citations
14.
Moore, Tim, et al.. (1996). Predicting falls: risk assessment tool versus clinical judgement.. PubMed. 20(1). 8–11.17 indexed citations
Stonehouse, John. (1975). Death of an idealist. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.