John Stanley

567 citations
28 papers · 187 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

John Stanley

23 papers receiving 148 citations

Peers

John Stanley
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Philosophy 43
  • Political Science and International Relations 67
  • History and Philosophy of Science 9
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 59
Replace Frederick Pollock with:
Frederick Pollock United States
Laurence Dickey United States
Douwe Fokkema Netherlands
Peter Nicholson United Kingdom
Mahatma Gandhi
Zhang Longxi Hong Kong
Páll S. Árdal Canada
Richard Whately
Johnnie Gratton Ireland
Donald A. Cress
John Stanley relative to Frederick Pollock United States Frederick Pollock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Frederick Pollock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Stanley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stanley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stanley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stanley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stanley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stanley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stanley. The network helps show where John Stanley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Stanley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Stanley Line = papers co-authored together John Stanley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198634
2 200533
3 199228
4 197413
5 198311
6 198110
7 20116
8 19845
9 19855
10 19695
11 19705
12 19954
13 19873
14
Zeev Sternhell, Mario Sznajder, Maia Asheri, Naissance de l'idéologie fasciste
19893
15
From Georges Sorel
19903
16 19823
17 20183
18 19983
19 19852
20 19892

About John Stanley

John Stanley is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 187 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (43 citations), Political Science and International Relations (67 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (20 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (59 citations). John Stanley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward J. Harpham, Ali Kamali, Barbara Deckard, Harold J. Laski, Georges Sorel, Lloyd Kramer, Arthur L. Greil, Kenneth H. Tucker, Henry Purcell and Johann Sebastian Bach. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Slavonic Papers, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review, Labour / Le Travail and Political Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact