John Schmitt
- Surgery top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Rosa Angela FabioJ. Haxby AbbottPaul E. NiemuthKathleen MatuskaMitchell HaasCharles H. GoldsmithGert BrønfortMorris Levin
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers)Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers)Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandCanada
In The Last Decade
John Schmitt
13 papers receiving 957 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Surgery 507
- Pharmacology 309
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 279
- Biomedical Engineering 236
- Epidemiology 142
Countries citing papers authored by John Schmitt
This map shows the geographic impact of John Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Schmitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Schmitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Schmitt. The network helps show where John Schmitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Schmitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Schmitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Schmitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Schmitt. John Schmitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | Minimum Important Differences for the Patient-Specific Functional Scale, 4 Region-Specific Outcome Measures, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale | 7 |
| 8 | 125 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 208 | |
| 12 | 86 | |
| 13 | 411 |
About John Schmitt
John Schmitt is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Pharmacology and Occupational Therapy, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (279 citations), Pharmacology (309 citations) and Occupational Therapy (56 citations). John Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rosa Angela Fabio, J. Haxby Abbott, Paul E. Niemuth, Kathleen Matuska, Mitchell Haas, Charles H. Goldsmith, Gert Brønfort, Morris Levin, Brent Leininger and Roni Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.