John Rees

76 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Earth-Surface Processes 435
  • Environmental Chemistry 266
  • Atmospheric Science 449
  • Economics and Econometrics 415
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 92
Replace Pradeep Srivastava with:
Pradeep Srivastava India
Paul Brewer United Kingdom
Joaquı́n Tintoré Spain
Klaus Jacob United States
Barbara Neumann Germany
Matthew J. Burke United Kingdom
Peter J. Hill United States
Laurens M. Bouwer Netherlands
Guoxiang Li China
John Rees relative to Pradeep Srivastava India Pradeep Srivastava's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Pradeep Srivastava · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Rees. The network helps show where John Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Rees Line = papers co-authored together John Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009181
2 1990124
3 1998122
4 1979108
5 198795
6 200072
7 201370
8 200966
9 200763
10 199862
11 199348
12 201245
13 198444
14 199943
15 200040
16
Regional growth and decline in the United States
198540
17
A formational framework for the Mercia Mudstone Group (Triassic) of England and Wales
200838
18 200736
19 200034
20 200933

About John Rees

John Rees is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Environmental Chemistry, Paleontology, Developmental Biology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (12 papers), Geological formations and processes (10 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (9 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (6 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (5 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (5 papers) and Regional Development and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (435 citations), Environmental Chemistry (266 citations), Atmospheric Science (449 citations), Economics and Econometrics (415 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (92 citations). John Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Albert N. Link, Erica Schoenberger, Thomas M. Williams, Deddy Setiapermana, M. A. Lovell, Adolfo Maestro, Antonio Barnolas, F. Javier Hernández‐Molina, David A. Long and J. Ridgway. Their work appears in journals such as Geological Society London Special Publications, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Regional Studies, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026