John R. Porter
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 5%
- Surgery
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hector E. FloresAra DerMarderosianNisit KittipongpatanaRick S. HockMichael PackRebecca G. WellsKyung Ah KooAlan J. Freyer
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers)Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers)Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
John R. Porter
48 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Molecular Biology 547
- Plant Science 544
- Surgery 236
- Pharmacology 229
- Food Science 210
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Porter. The network helps show where John R. Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Porter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Porter. John R. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | Designers' Perspectives on Effective Professional Development for Scientist- and Engineer-Educators | 0 |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | La Bible oubliée : apocryphes de l'Ancien et du Nouveau Testament | 1 |
| 7 | Meaningful Credentials for Career Academies. | 1 |
| 8 | The Lost Bible: Forgotten Scriptures Revealed | 1 |
| 9 | Euripides and Menander: Epitrepontes, Act IV | 1 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Anglo-Saxon Riddles | 2 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 122 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | A critical essay, containing some remarks upon the nature of epistolary and elegiac poetry | 0 |
| 20 | Moses and monarchy : a study in the Biblical tradition of Moses | 1 |
About John R. Porter
John R. Porter is a scholar working on Religious studies, Architecture and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (147 citations), Biochemistry (91 citations) and Plant Science (544 citations). John R. Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hector E. Flores, Ara DerMarderosian, Nisit Kittipongpatana, Rick S. Hock, Michael Pack, Rebecca G. Wells, Kyung Ah Koo, Alan J. Freyer, Orith Waisbourd‐Zinman and Lew Killmer. Their work appears in journals such as Hepatology, Food Chemistry and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.