John R. Franks

798 total citations
36 papers, 600 citations indexed

About

John R. Franks is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, John R. Franks has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 600 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Speech and Hearing, 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in John R. Franks's work include Noise Effects and Management (27 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (26 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers). John R. Franks is often cited by papers focused on Noise Effects and Management (27 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (26 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers). John R. Franks collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Sweden. John R. Franks's co-authors include William J. Murphy, Rickie R. Davis, Luann E. Van Campen, Mark Toraason, Charles S. Watson, Donald C. Hood, Edward F. Krieg, Thaís C. Morata, John G. Casali and Elliott H. Berger and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

John R. Franks

33 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John R. Franks United States 13 397 355 268 40 35 36 600
Larry H. Royster United States 14 382 1.0× 369 1.0× 286 1.1× 17 0.4× 61 1.7× 61 584
Christian Meyer-Bisch France 12 228 0.6× 227 0.6× 186 0.7× 14 0.3× 17 0.5× 24 536
Julia Doswell Royster United States 10 271 0.7× 264 0.7× 207 0.8× 7 0.2× 9 0.3× 26 362
E Rebentisch Germany 8 253 0.6× 160 0.5× 148 0.6× 5 0.1× 30 0.9× 11 388
Fredrik Lindgren Sweden 17 336 0.8× 355 1.0× 373 1.4× 5 0.1× 9 0.3× 30 622
Michel Loeb United States 16 167 0.4× 341 1.0× 94 0.4× 11 0.3× 19 0.5× 54 645
R. P. Gannon Canada 11 125 0.3× 250 0.7× 281 1.0× 10 0.3× 18 0.5× 25 431
Alice H. Suter United States 9 256 0.6× 199 0.6× 132 0.5× 18 0.5× 16 0.5× 20 343
Heraldo Lorena Guida Brazil 13 91 0.2× 197 0.6× 72 0.3× 6 0.1× 33 0.9× 40 397
Kamil Zaborowski Poland 8 235 0.6× 155 0.4× 109 0.4× 2 0.1× 57 1.6× 22 307

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Franks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Franks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Franks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Franks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Franks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Franks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Franks. The network helps show where John R. Franks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Franks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Franks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Franks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Franks. John R. Franks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Heyer, Nicholas, Thaís C. Morata, Lynne E. Pinkerton, et al.. (2010). Use of historical data and a novel metric in the evaluation of the effectiveness of hearing conservation program components. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 68(7). 510–517. 32 indexed citations
2.
Murphy, William J. & John R. Franks. (2004). Revisiting the quartic model for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 116(4_Supplement). 2600–2600. 1 indexed citations
3.
Murphy, William J., et al.. (2004). Early indicators of noise-induced hearing loss: Issues for consideration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 116(4_Supplement). 2600–2600.
4.
Franks, John R., et al.. (2003). Alternative Field Methods for Measuring Hearing Protector Performance. AIHA Journal. 64(4). 501–509. 7 indexed citations
5.
Morata, Thaís C., Ann‐Chrístin Johnson, Per Nylén, et al.. (2002). Audiometric Findings in Workers Exposed to Low Levels of Styrene and Noise. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 44(9). 806–814. 79 indexed citations
6.
Campen, Luann E. Van, et al.. (2002). Oxidative DNA damage is associated with intense noise exposure in the rat. Hearing Research. 164(1-2). 29–38. 112 indexed citations
7.
Franks, John R., et al.. (2000). Four Earplugs in Search of a Rating System. Ear and Hearing. 21(3). 218–226. 17 indexed citations
8.
Murphy, William J., et al.. (1999). Evaluation of a FitCheck hearing protector test system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 106(4_Supplement). 2263–2263. 5 indexed citations
9.
Murphy, William J. & John R. Franks. (1999). Progress on a rating system for hearing protector attenuation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 106(4_Supplement). 2262–2263. 1 indexed citations
10.
Royster, Julia Doswell, Elliott H. Berger, John R. Franks, et al.. (1996). Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 99(3). 1506–1526. 27 indexed citations
11.
Franks, John R., William J. Murphy, & Stephen D. Simon. (1996). Repeatability and reproducibility in hearing protector testing.. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 99(4_Supplement). 2464–2500. 1 indexed citations
12.
Franks, John R., et al.. (1995). Ear based hearing protector/communication system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 98(6). 3028–3028. 4 indexed citations
13.
Franks, John R., et al.. (1992). The Effect of Fitting Procedure on Hearing Protector Attenuation. Ear and Hearing. 13(1). 11–18. 6 indexed citations
14.
Franks, John R., et al.. (1992). Real Ear Attenuation at Threshold for Three Audiometric Headphone Devices. Ear and Hearing. 13(1). 2–10. 12 indexed citations
15.
Davis, Rickie R., et al.. (1991). Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90(4). 1979–1985. 47 indexed citations
16.
Franks, John R., et al.. (1989). Analysis of a Hearing Conservation Program Data Base. Ear and Hearing. 10(5). 273–280. 16 indexed citations
17.
Davis, Rickie R. & John R. Franks. (1989). Design and construction of a noise exposure chamber for small animals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 85(2). 963–966. 9 indexed citations
18.
Feth, Lawrence L., et al.. (1985). Effects of normal and pathologic eardrum impedance on sound pressure in the aided ear canal: A computer simulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 78(4). 1281–1285. 7 indexed citations
19.
Cooper, William A., et al.. (1975). Variable Venting Valve for Earmolds. International Journal of Audiology. 14(3). 259–267. 2 indexed citations
20.
Watson, Charles S., John R. Franks, & Donald C. Hood. (1972). Detection of Tones in the Absence of External Masking Noise. I. Effects of Signal Intensity and Signal Frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 52(2B). 633–643. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026