John Pullen

422 citations
43 papers · 219 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Pullen

40 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

John Pullen
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 84
  • Economics and Econometrics 134
  • Sociology and Political Science 152
  • Political Science and International Relations 44
  • History and Philosophy of Science 6
Replace Terry Peach with:
Terry Peach United Kingdom
Mark Falcoff United States
Marlous van Waijenburg Netherlands
Christine Moll-Murata Germany
Leticia Arroyo Abad United States
Luís Bértola Uruguay
Karl Kautsky
Gerard M. Koot United States
Suzanne Paine United Kingdom
Pat Hudson United Kingdom
John Pullen relative to Terry Peach United Kingdom Terry Peach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Terry Peach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pullen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pullen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pullen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pullen. The network helps show where John Pullen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside John Pullen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pullen Line = papers co-authored together John Pullen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198128
2 198219
3 201017
4 201711
5 20099
6 19958
7 19818
8 20068
9 19888
10
The Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution: A Critical History
20098
11 20017
12 20136
13 20016
14 19715
15 20165
16 19985
17 19894
18 19974
19 19874
20 20053

About John Pullen

John Pullen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 43 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (25 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (24 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (15 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (2 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (84 citations), Economics and Econometrics (134 citations), Sociology and Political Science (152 citations), Political Science and International Relations (44 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations). John Pullen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hitoshi Hashimoto, Philippa Watson, Alan E. Treloar and E. A. Wrigley. Their work appears in journals such as History of Political Economy, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge Journal of Economics and Religious Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact