John Pringle
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Genetics
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers)Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceOrthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciencesBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomKenyaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Pringle
9 papers receiving 561 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 279
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 181
- Molecular Biology 158
- Biomedical Engineering 153
- Genetics 136
Countries citing papers authored by John Pringle
This map shows the geographic impact of John Pringle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pringle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pringle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Pringle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pringle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pringle. The network helps show where John Pringle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Pringle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Pringle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Pringle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Pringle. John Pringle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 212 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 109 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 133 | |
| 9 | Commentaries on the Epistles of Paul the apostle to the Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians | 8 |
About John Pringle
John Pringle is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Religious studies, having authored 9 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (279 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (181 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (59 citations). John Pringle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Kenya and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. E. Machin, R. T. Tregear, Francis Darwin, Kosçak Maruyama and Jean Calvin. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences and Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.