John Phillips

43 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

John Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Urban Studies 42
  • Geography, Planning and Development 32
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 23
  • Gender Studies 45
  • Internal Medicine 16
Replace Arvind Rajagopal with:
Arvind Rajagopal United States
Kieran Tranter Australia
Mireille Lalancette Canada
Anthony Paul Smith United States
Huong T. Bui Japan
Allen Batteau United States
Allan Watson United Kingdom
Michael McCahill United Kingdom
Peter Mann United Kingdom
Adam Brown Australia
John Phillips relative to Arvind Rajagopal United States Arvind Rajagopal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Arvind Rajagopal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Phillips. The network helps show where John Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Phillips Line = papers co-authored together John Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006153
2 200637
3 200520
4 201918
5 201818
6 200715
7 201112
8 201310
9
Contested Knowledge: A Guide to Critical Theory
20008
10 20138
11 20237
12 20026
13 20026
14 20145
15 20075
16 19524
17 20104
18 20063
19 20043
20 20063

About John Phillips

John Phillips is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (4 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (4 papers), Military History and Strategy (4 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers) and Cybernetics and Technology in Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (42 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (32 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (23 citations), Gender Studies (45 citations) and Internal Medicine (16 citations). John Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ryan Bishop, A. Shaun Rowe, Couze Venn, Roy Boyne, Jamie G. Cooper, Richard Body, Edward Carlton, Steve Bell, Alexander Thompson and Andy Rosser. Their work appears in journals such as Theory Culture & Society, Oxford Literary Review, Parallax, Critical Perspectives on International Business and British Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact