Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production
20001.9k citationsJohn O. StoneJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresprofile →
A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements
20081.7k citationsGreg Balco, John O. Stone et al.Quaternary Geochronologyprofile →
Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project
2015544 citationsBrian Borchers, Shasta M. Marrero et al.Quaternary Geochronologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John O. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O. Stone more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O. Stone. The network helps show where John O. Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John O. Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John O. Stone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John O. Stone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John O. Stone. John O. Stone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stone, John O., et al.. (2014). Glacial Erosion Rates from Bayesian Inversion of Cosmogenic Nuclide Concentrations in a Bedrock Core, Streaked Mtn., ME. AGUFM. 2014.1 indexed citations
8.
Phillips, Fred M., Shasta M. Marrero, John O. Stone, & Nathaniel A. Lifton. (2012). Chlorine-36 Production Rate Calibration by the CRONUS-Earth Project. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2012.1 indexed citations
Marrero, Shasta M., Fred M. Phillips, John O. Stone, & Brian Borchers. (2008). Cosmogenic 36 Cl calibration of potassium production rates. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 72(12).1 indexed citations
12.
Balco, Greg, John O. Stone, Nathaniel A. Lifton, & Tibor J. Dunai. (2008). A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements. Quaternary Geochronology. 3(3). 174–195.1660 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Enzel, Yehouda, Itai Haviv, E. N. ZIL'BERMAN, et al.. (2005). Waterfall Retreat Rates along the Dead Sea Western Tectonic Escarpment. AGUFM. 2005.3 indexed citations
Stone, John O., Greg Balco, David E. Sugden, et al.. (2001). Late Holocene Deglaciation of Marie Byrd Land, West Antarctica. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001.4 indexed citations
16.
Stone, John O.. (2000). Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 105(B10). 23753–23759.1922 indexed citations breakdown →
Stone, John O., et al.. (1996). Cosmogenic chlorine-36 production rates from calcium and potassium.. Radiocarbon. 38(1). 170–171.31 indexed citations
20.
Stone, John O., et al.. (1990). SI Isotopes in SiC from Carbonaceous and Enstatite Chondrites. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 21. 1212.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.