John Newton

5.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
143 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

John Newton is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, John Newton has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 25 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 16 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in John Newton's work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (49 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (16 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (15 papers). John Newton is often cited by papers focused on Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (49 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (16 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (15 papers). John Newton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. John Newton's co-authors include John T. Fell, Fridrun Podczeck, R.C. Rowe, Michael D. Short, Peter Stanley, Paul J. Harrison, Graham Buckton, Delos D. Wickens, Paul O’Brien and G. Rowley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Chemical Communications and Journal of Controlled Release.

In The Last Decade

John Newton

135 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

Determination of Tablet Strength by the Diametral-Compres... 1970 2026 1988 2007 1970 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Newton United Kingdom 33 2.6k 873 719 624 581 143 4.3k
J.M. Newton United Kingdom 31 1.1k 0.4× 338 0.4× 270 0.4× 309 0.5× 549 0.9× 123 2.9k
Feng Zhang United States 31 2.1k 0.8× 262 0.3× 306 0.4× 913 1.5× 760 1.3× 119 3.6k
Petteri Paronen Finland 29 1.2k 0.5× 232 0.3× 428 0.6× 250 0.4× 273 0.5× 90 2.3k
Kendal Pitt United Kingdom 21 1.1k 0.4× 440 0.5× 209 0.3× 220 0.4× 228 0.4× 35 1.9k
Ian Larson Australia 42 771 0.3× 355 0.4× 759 1.1× 664 1.1× 795 1.4× 104 5.6k
Jan Visser Netherlands 27 508 0.2× 231 0.3× 301 0.4× 367 0.6× 302 0.5× 65 3.2k
Ali R. Rajabi‐Siahboomi United Kingdom 32 1.8k 0.7× 123 0.1× 345 0.5× 422 0.7× 257 0.4× 88 2.7k
Amrit Paudel Austria 27 1.5k 0.6× 159 0.2× 525 0.7× 671 1.1× 451 0.8× 134 2.9k
Dennis Douroumis United Kingdom 49 3.2k 1.2× 295 0.3× 396 0.6× 1.5k 2.3× 1.1k 1.9× 156 6.9k
Yunhui Wu China 35 1.1k 0.4× 185 0.2× 269 0.4× 1.2k 1.9× 463 0.8× 126 4.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John Newton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Newton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Newton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Newton. The network helps show where John Newton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Newton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Newton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Newton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Newton. John Newton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Podczeck, Fridrun, et al.. (2007). The evaluation of modified microcrystalline cellulose for the preparation of pellets with high drug loading by extrusion/spheronization. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 350(1-2). 145–154. 45 indexed citations
2.
Holmes, Stuart M., et al.. (2006). A novel porous carbon based on diatomaceous earth. Chemical Communications. 2662–2662. 41 indexed citations
3.
Podczeck, Fridrun, et al.. (2003). The application of non-contact laser profilometry to the determination of permanent structural changes induced by compaction of pellets. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 21(2-3). 143–154. 14 indexed citations
4.
Newton, John, et al.. (2002). The influence of liquid binder on the liquid mobility and preparation of spherical granules by the process of extrusion/spheronization. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 238(1-2). 61–76. 24 indexed citations
5.
Patel, Hasmukh A., et al.. (2001). Measuring the water retention capacities (MRC) of different microcrystalline cellulose grades. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 12(3). 321–325. 28 indexed citations
6.
Elliott, James A., P. J. James, Terence J McMaster, et al.. (2001). Hydrolysis of the Nafion ® precursor studied by X-ray scattering and in-situ atomic force microscopy. e-Polymers. 1(1). 26 indexed citations
7.
Haririan, Ismaeil, et al.. (2000). DETERMINATION OF MECHANICAL STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT MATERIAL DOUBLE-LAYER RECTANGULAR TABLETS. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 8(12). 20–25. 4 indexed citations
8.
Mantle, Michael D., et al.. (1999). Measuring water distribution in extrudates using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 189(1). 19–28. 20 indexed citations
9.
Pettersson, Bo, Fridrun Podczeck, & John Newton. (1997). Fracture Mechanics of Model Granulation Systems. Pharmacy and Pharmacology Communications. 3(7). 329–331. 1 indexed citations
10.
Podczeck, Fridrun, et al.. (1995). CALCULATION OF THE DRUG ABSORPTION RATES OF 2 SUSTAINED-RELEASE THEOPHYLLINE FORMULATIONS USING QUANTIFIED MAXIMUM-ENTROPY. UCL Discovery (University College London). 3 indexed citations
11.
Newton, John, et al.. (1993). The mechanical properties of an homologous series of benzoic acid esters. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 39(4). 153–157. 20 indexed citations
12.
Newton, John, et al.. (1992). Movement of liquids through powder beds. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 79(1-3). 47–60. 22 indexed citations
13.
Newton, John, et al.. (1992). A comparison of the extrusion and spheronization behaviour of wet powder masses processed by a ram extruder and a cylinder extruder. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 81(2-3). 225–233. 32 indexed citations
14.
Newton, John, et al.. (1987). The characterization of the mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose: a fracture mechanics approach. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 39(12). 961–965. 68 indexed citations
15.
Newton, John, et al.. (1986). Statistical analysis of gastrointestinal transit time of pharmaceutical formulations. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 38(4). 327–328. 1 indexed citations
16.
Newton, John, et al.. (1979). A Modified Weibull Analysis for Fracture Test Data of Tablets Which Vary in Volume and Density. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 31(Supplement_1). 77P–77P. 1 indexed citations
17.
Newton, John. (1965). Scrutiny's Failure with Shakespeare. The Cambridge Quarterly. I(2). 144–177.
18.
Newton, John, et al.. (1962). The journal of a slave trader (John Newton), 1750-1754 : with Newton's thoughts upon the African slave trade. 4 indexed citations
19.
Hugo, W. B. & John Newton. (1960). The Critical Micelle Concentration of Polyethyleneglycolmonocetylether. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 12(1). 447–448. 2 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Roger, et al.. (1953). ECH volume 4 issue 2 Front matter. The Journal of Ecclesiastical History. 4(2). f1–f3. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026