John Neeft
Impact in
- Catalysis top 2%
- Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
-
- Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Papers in
-
- Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions 3
-
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability 3
- Co-authors
- Jacob A. Moulijn (2 shared papers)Michiel Makkee (2 shared papers)Freek Kapteijn (1 shared paper)Guido Mul (1 shared paper)Horst Fehrenbach (1 shared paper)Dominik Rutz (2 shared papers)Rainer Janssen (2 shared papers)P. Helm (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Applied Catalysis B: Environmental (2 papers)Fuel (2 papers)Applied Energy (1 paper)OAR@UM (University of Malta) (1 paper)ETA Florence (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
John Neeft
7 papers receiving 803 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Catalysis 459
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 113
- Materials Chemistry 704
- Automotive Engineering 95
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 100
Countries citing papers authored by John Neeft
This map shows the geographic impact of John Neeft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Neeft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Neeft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Neeft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Neeft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Neeft. The network helps show where John Neeft may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside John Neeft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 325 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 250 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 116 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 87 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 7 | THE EU CARBON LABELLING INITIATIVE | 2007 | 1 |
| 8 | RESULTS FROM THE EUROPEAN CARBON LABELLING INITIATIVE CO2STAR | 2008 | 1 |
About John Neeft
John Neeft is a scholar working on Catalysis, Environmental Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Impact and Sustainability (3 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (3 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (3 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (2 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (1 paper), Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure (1 paper) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (459 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (113 citations), Materials Chemistry (704 citations), Automotive Engineering (95 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (100 citations). John Neeft has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jacob A. Moulijn, Michiel Makkee, Freek Kapteijn, Guido Mul, Horst Fehrenbach, Dominik Rutz, Rainer Janssen, P. Helm and Simon Borg. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Fuel, Applied Energy, OAR@UM (University of Malta) and ETA Florence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.