John N. Richardson
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Electrochemistry top 1%
- Materials Chemistry
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Royce W. MurrayMichael T. CarterGary K. RoweMichael D. MusickDavid J. PeñaTodd M. McEvoyCarl J. SeliskarMichael J. Natan
- Topics
- Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (21 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (15 papers)Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
John N. Richardson
34 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 635
- Electrochemistry 532
- Materials Chemistry 260
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 247
- Molecular Biology 241
Countries citing papers authored by John N. Richardson
This map shows the geographic impact of John N. Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John N. Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John N. Richardson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John N. Richardson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John N. Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John N. Richardson. The network helps show where John N. Richardson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John N. Richardson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John N. Richardson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John N. Richardson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John N. Richardson. John N. Richardson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 242 | |
| 17 | 86 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About John N. Richardson
John N. Richardson is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Bioengineering and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (21 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (15 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (532 citations), Bioengineering (210 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (247 citations). John N. Richardson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Royce W. Murray, Michael T. Carter, Gary K. Rowe, Michael D. Musick, David J. Peña, Todd M. McEvoy, Carl J. Seliskar, Michael J. Natan, William R. Heineman and Tanya Shtoyko. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemistry of Materials and Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.