John McGurran

677 total citations
17 papers, 507 citations indexed

About

John McGurran is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, John McGurran has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 507 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in John McGurran's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (6 papers). John McGurran is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (6 papers). John McGurran collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Tanzania and United States. John McGurran's co-authors include Tom Noseworthy, Barbara Conner‐Spady, David C. Hadorn, Claudia Sanmartin, Geoffrey Johnston, G. William Arnett, Carolyn De Coster, Robert A. Bear, Angela Estey and Diane Lorenzetti and has published in prestigious journals such as Canadian Medical Association Journal, Health Policy and Health Expectations.

In The Last Decade

John McGurran

17 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John McGurran Canada	15	235	218	109	96	62	17	507
Cathleen Mooney United States	12	329 1.4×	288 1.3×	39 0.4×	27 0.3×	42 0.7×	16	741
Ashley Miller Canada	6	230 1.0×	137 0.6×	27 0.2×	37 0.4×	44 0.7×	12	449
E Nordberg Sweden	11	83 0.4×	42 0.2×	79 0.7×	78 0.8×	25 0.4×	31	469
Ann Nguyen United States	10	311 1.3×	72 0.3×	19 0.2×	34 0.4×	58 0.9×	41	577
Andrew O. Johnson United States	11	157 0.7×	79 0.4×	18 0.2×	46 0.5×	50 0.8×	15	445
Andrew J. Potter United States	12	223 0.9×	89 0.4×	15 0.1×	22 0.2×	39 0.6×	23	415
Mélissa De Regge Belgium	14	141 0.6×	67 0.3×	79 0.7×	81 0.8×	41 0.7×	41	483
Amin Kazzi United States	12	134 0.6×	34 0.2×	55 0.5×	99 1.0×	37 0.6×	55	510
Michael L. Lindsey United States	8	154 0.7×	139 0.6×	75 0.7×	18 0.2×	41 0.7×	10	498
Francis D. Chesley United States	9	204 0.9×	109 0.5×	22 0.2×	26 0.3×	30 0.5×	16	390

Countries citing papers authored by John McGurran

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McGurran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McGurran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McGurran more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McGurran

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McGurran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McGurran. The network helps show where John McGurran may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John McGurran

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John McGurran. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John McGurran based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John McGurran. John McGurran is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, et al.. (2011). The importance of patient expectations as a determinant of satisfaction with waiting times for hip and knee replacement surgery. Health Policy. 101(3). 245–252. 36 indexed citations

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, et al.. (2009). ‘There are too many of us to fix.’ Patients’ views of acceptable waiting times for hip and knee replacement. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 14(4). 212–218. 11 indexed citations

Sanmartin, Claudia, Kellie E. Murphy, Barbara Conner‐Spady, et al.. (2008). Appropriateness of healthcare interventions: Concepts and scoping of the published literature. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 24(3). 342–349. 47 indexed citations

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, et al.. (2008). Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 179(4). 327–332. 15 indexed citations

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, Geoffrey Johnston, Claudia Sanmartin, John McGurran, & Tom Noseworthy. (2007). Patient and Surgeon Views on Maximum Acceptable Waiting Times for Joint Replacement. Healthcare policy. 3(2). 102–116. 6 indexed citations

Cawthorpe, David, et al.. (2007). Priority-setting for children's mental health: clinical usefulness and validity of the priority criteria score.. PubMed. 16(1). 18–26. 19 indexed citations

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, Claudia Sanmartin, Carolyn De Coster, et al.. (2007). A systematic literature review of the evidence on benchmarks for cataract surgery waiting time. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 42(4). 543–551. 27 indexed citations

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, Geoffrey Johnston, Claudia Sanmartin, John McGurran, & Tom Noseworthy. (2006). A bird can't fly on one wing: patient views on waiting for hip and knee replacement surgery. Health Expectations. 10(2). 108–116. 22 indexed citations

Coster, Carolyn De, et al.. (2006). The Western Canada Waiting List Project: development of a priority referral score for hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 13(2). 192–197. 28 indexed citations

10.

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, Angela Estey, G. William Arnett, et al.. (2005). Determinants of patient and surgeon perspectives on maximum acceptable waiting times for hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 10(2). 84–90. 25 indexed citations

11.

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, et al.. (2005). The Prioritization of Patients on Waiting Lists for Cataract Surgery: Validation of the Western Canada Waiting List Project Cataract Priority Criteria Tool. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 12(2). 81–90. 24 indexed citations

12.

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, et al.. (2005). Patient and physician perspectives of maximum acceptable waiting times for cataract surgery. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 40(4). 439–447. 18 indexed citations

13.

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, Angela Estey, G. William Arnett, et al.. (2004). Prioritization of patients on waiting lists for hip and knee replacement: Validation of a priority criteria tool. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 20(4). 509–515. 37 indexed citations

14.

Conner‐Spady, Barbara, et al.. (2004). Prioritization of patients on scheduled waiting lists: validation of a scoring system for hip and knee arthroplasty.. PubMed. 47(1). 39–46. 35 indexed citations

15.

Sanmartin, Claudia, Tom Noseworthy, Morris L. Barer, et al.. (2003). Toward Standard Definitions for Waiting Times. Healthcare Management Forum. 16(2). 49–53. 14 indexed citations

16.

Noseworthy, Tom, John McGurran, & David C. Hadorn. (2003). Waiting for scheduled services in Canada: development of priority‐setting scoring systems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 9(1). 23–31. 123 indexed citations

17.

McGurran, John. (2002). Improving the Management of Waiting Lists for Elective Healthcare Services: Public Perspectives on Proposed Solutions. Healthcare Quarterly. 5(3). 28–32. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact