This map shows the geographic impact of John Maye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Maye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Maye more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Maye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Maye. The network helps show where John Maye may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Maye
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Maye.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Maye based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Maye. John Maye is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gegel, Brian, et al.. (2019). A Review of the Analgesic Benefi ts and Potential Complications Related to Epidural Corticosteroid Injections.. PubMed. 87(1). 71–79.3 indexed citations
Maye, John, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of postprocedure cognitive function using 3 distinct standard sedation regimens for endoscopic procedures.. PubMed. 82(2). 133–9.19 indexed citations
7.
Maye, John, et al.. (2012). Update for nurse anesthetists evidence-based anesthesia: The use of preprocedural ultrasonography during labor to facilitate placement of an epidural catheter.. PubMed. 80(3). 223–30.3 indexed citations
8.
Osborne, Lisa A., et al.. (2011). Perioperative administration of gabapentin for shoulder arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.. PubMed. 79(4 Suppl). S43–50.14 indexed citations
9.
Dyer, Christopher, et al.. (2010). Effects of guided imagery on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing same-day surgical procedures: a randomized, single-blind study.. PubMed. 78(3). 181–8.55 indexed citations
Maye, John, et al.. (2006). The effect of transdermal scopolamine on the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting in a group of high-risk patients given prophylactic intravenous ondansetron.. PubMed. 74(2). 127–32.16 indexed citations
13.
Maye, John, et al.. (2004). Analgesia and effectiveness of levobupivacaine compared with ropivacaine in patients undergoing an axillary brachial plexus block.. PubMed. 72(5). 339–45.37 indexed citations
14.
Maye, John, et al.. (2004). The addition of clonidine to bupivacaine in combined femoral-sciatic nerve block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.. PubMed. 72(4). 273–8.13 indexed citations
15.
Vacchiano, Charles, et al.. (2004). Effect of needle size on success of transarterial axillary block.. PubMed. 72(1). 57–60.4 indexed citations
16.
Maye, John, et al.. (2003). Hand ischemia associated with profound hypotension and radial artery catheterization in a pediatric patient: a case report.. PubMed. 71(1). 41–3.3 indexed citations
17.
Vacchiano, Charles, et al.. (2002). A comparison of rocuronium and lidocaine for the prevention of postoperative myalgia after succinylcholine administration.. PubMed. 70(5). 367–72.4 indexed citations
18.
Vacchiano, Charles, et al.. (2002). The effect of spinal introducer needle use on postoperative back pain.. PubMed. 70(6). 449–52.12 indexed citations
19.
Maye, John, et al.. (2002). Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a case report.. PubMed. 70(3). 215–7.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.