John Mathew

19 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers

John Mathew
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 386
  • Genetics 352
  • Insect Science 144
  • Ecological Modeling 25
  • Organic Chemistry 149
Replace Scott R. Smedley with:
Scott R. Smedley United States
Takaya IKEMOTO Japan
Juan A. Torres United States
Damjan Franjević Croatia
Carlos Schwartz Brazil
Yoshito Suzuki Japan
Evaldo F. Vilela Brazil
Massimo Cristofaro Italy
Noboru Katayama Japan
Donald J. Lee United States
John Mathew relative to Scott R. Smedley United States Scott R. Smedley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Scott R. Smedley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mathew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mathew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mathew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mathew. The network helps show where John Mathew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mathew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mathew Line = papers co-authored together John Mathew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002395
2 200858
3 200055
4 200745
5 200239
6 200838
7 200735
8 201529
9 200926
10 200619
11 201119
12 201412
13 200411
14 20059
15 20097
16 20094
17
THE SINGING REAPER: DIET, MORPHOLOGY AND VIBRATIONAL SIGNALING IN THE NEARCTIC SPECIES FENISECA TARQUINIUS (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE, MILETINAE)*
20083
18 20151
19 20181
20 20210

About John Mathew

John Mathew is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics, Small Animals and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 806 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coccidia and coccidiosis research (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (4 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (386 citations), Genetics (352 citations), Insect Science (144 citations), Ecological Modeling (25 citations) and Organic Chemistry (149 citations). John Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Naomi E. Pierce, David J. Lohman, Mark A. Travassos, Alan G. Heath, Michael F. Braby, Gregory S. May, Nir Osherov, Dennis M. Schmatz, Chris M. Brown and Michael H. Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Fungal Genetics and Biology, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact