John Malone-Lee

2.7k citations
12 papers · 349 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Malone-Lee

11 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

John Malone-Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
  • Artificial Intelligence 341
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 122
  • Information Systems 134
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 67
  • Computer Networks and Communications 53
Replace Joël Alwen with:
Joël Alwen United States
Joseph Jaeger United States
Jason Perry United States
Adriana López-Alt United States
Allison Lewko United States
Noel McCullagh Ireland
Zuhua Shao China
Brice Minaud United Kingdom
Fabien Laguillaumie France
Jae Hong Seo South Korea
John Malone-Lee relative to Joël Alwen United States Joël Alwen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joël Alwen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Malone-Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Malone-Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Malone-Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Malone-Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Malone-Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Malone-Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Malone-Lee. The network helps show where John Malone-Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside John Malone-Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Malone-Lee Line = papers co-authored together John Malone-Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2007181
2 200757
3 200223
4 200920
5 200619
6 200615
7 201010
8 20059
9
Flaws in Applying Proof Methodologies to Signature Schemes
20028
10
Identity-Based Traitor Tracing
20075
11
Identity-Based Encryption Gone Wild
20062
12
Modifications of ECDSA
20030

About John Malone-Lee

John Malone-Lee is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, General Health Professions and Philosophy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryptography and Data Security (8 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (6 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (3 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (2 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (2 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (341 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (122 citations), Information Systems (134 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (67 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (53 citations). John Malone-Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Burundi and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nigel P. Smart, Michel Abdalla⋆, Gregory Neven, Dario Catalano, Tadayoshi Kohno, Pascal Paillier, Mihir Bellare, Eike Kiltz, Tanja Lange and Pooya Farshim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cryptology, Designs Codes and Cryptography, International Journal of Information Security, Lecture notes in computer science and Information Processing Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact