John M. Peloquin

1.7k total citations
34 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

John M. Peloquin is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Peloquin has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 16 papers in Surgery and 12 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in John M. Peloquin's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (12 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (10 papers). John M. Peloquin is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (12 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (10 papers). John M. Peloquin collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. John M. Peloquin's co-authors include Dawn M. Elliott, Cynthia A. Reinhart‐King, John Huynh, K. M. Reddy, Mark Engelhard, C. P. Hays, Alex Punnoose, Edward J. Vresilovic, Joseph P. Califano and Michael R. King and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

John M. Peloquin

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John M. Peloquin United States 15 383 342 257 256 221 34 1.4k
Uday K. Tirlapur United Kingdom 25 638 1.7× 654 1.9× 67 0.3× 194 0.8× 167 0.8× 48 2.0k
I. ap Gwynn United Kingdom 18 357 0.9× 136 0.4× 147 0.6× 253 1.0× 174 0.8× 40 1.1k
Weirong Xing United States 32 176 0.5× 1.1k 3.2× 272 1.1× 200 0.8× 102 0.5× 79 2.8k
Nan Wu China 28 214 0.6× 528 1.5× 198 0.8× 140 0.5× 57 0.3× 90 2.0k
Lewis W. Francis United Kingdom 26 320 0.8× 524 1.5× 71 0.3× 136 0.5× 182 0.8× 73 1.5k
Cynthia Boehm United States 19 714 1.9× 463 1.4× 84 0.3× 798 3.1× 84 0.4× 51 2.5k
Sungjo Park United States 25 747 2.0× 1.0k 3.0× 247 1.0× 141 0.6× 175 0.8× 61 2.3k
Vijay Krishna Raghunathan United States 28 291 0.8× 642 1.9× 65 0.3× 159 0.6× 636 2.9× 84 2.2k
Shangfeng Liu China 23 161 0.4× 817 2.4× 151 0.6× 71 0.3× 122 0.6× 107 1.8k
Silviya P. Zustiak United States 25 997 2.6× 290 0.8× 111 0.4× 270 1.1× 311 1.4× 74 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Peloquin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Peloquin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Peloquin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Peloquin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Peloquin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Peloquin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Peloquin. The network helps show where John M. Peloquin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Peloquin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Peloquin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Peloquin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Peloquin. John M. Peloquin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Peloquin, John M. & Dawn M. Elliott. (2024). Global and local identifiability analysis of a nonlinear biphasic constitutive model in confined compression. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 21(220). 20240415–20240415. 1 indexed citations
5.
Peloquin, John M., David R. Steinberg, Miltiadis H. Zgonis, et al.. (2024). Time‐dependent changes in medial meniscus kinematics and attachment strength after anterior root injury and repair in a large animal model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 43(3). 692–702. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Peloquin, John M., Michael H. Santare, & Dawn M. Elliott. (2023). Volume Loss and Recovery in Bovine Knee Meniscus Loaded in Circumferential Tension. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 145(7). 3 indexed citations
8.
Peloquin, John M., et al.. (2023). MRI‐based measurement of in vivo disc mechanics in a young population due to flexion, extension, and diurnal loading. JOR Spine. 6(1). e1243–e1243. 8 indexed citations
9.
Peloquin, John M., et al.. (2020). Structure, function, and defect tolerance with maturation of the radial tie fiber network in the knee meniscus. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 38(12). 2709–2720. 13 indexed citations
10.
Johnson, Curtis L., et al.. (2020). Impact of pulse sequence, analysis method, and signal to noise ratio on the accuracy of intervertebral disc T2 measurement. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(3). e1102–e1102. 7 indexed citations
11.
Peloquin, John M., Michael H. Santare, & Dawn M. Elliott. (2018). Short cracks in knee meniscus tissue cause strain concentrations, but do not reduce ultimate stress, in single-cycle uniaxial tension. Royal Society Open Science. 5(11). 181166–181166. 13 indexed citations
12.
Locke, Ryan C., et al.. (2017). StrainDistribution of Intact Rat Rotator Cuff Tendon-to-Bone Attachments and Attachments WithDefects. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 139(11). 15 indexed citations
13.
DeLucca, John F., John M. Peloquin, Lachlan J. Smith, et al.. (2016). MRI quantification of human spine cartilage endplate geometry: Comparison with age, degeneration, level, and disc geometry. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 34(8). 1410–1417. 14 indexed citations
14.
Showalter, Brent L., John F. DeLucca, John M. Peloquin, et al.. (2015). Novel human intervertebral disc strain template to quantify regional three‐dimensional strains in a population and compare to internal strains predicted by a finite element model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 34(7). 1264–1273. 22 indexed citations
15.
Peloquin, John M. & Dawn M. Elliott. (2015). A comparison of stress in cracked fibrous tissue specimens with varied crack location, loading, and orientation using finite element analysis. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 57. 260–268. 12 indexed citations
16.
Peloquin, John M., Jonathon H. Yoder, Nathan T. Jacobs, et al.. (2014). Human L3L4 intervertebral disc mean 3D shape, modes of variation, and their relationship to degeneration. Journal of Biomechanics. 47(10). 2452–2459. 45 indexed citations
17.
Jacobs, Nathan T., Daniel H. Cortes, John M. Peloquin, Edward J. Vresilovic, & Dawn M. Elliott. (2014). Validation and application of an intervertebral disc finite element model utilizing independently constructed tissue-level constitutive formulations that are nonlinear, anisotropic, and time-dependent. Journal of Biomechanics. 47(11). 2540–2546. 75 indexed citations
18.
Peloquin, John M., et al.. (2012). Evaluation of strengthening mechanisms in calcite single crystals from mollusk shells. Acta Biomaterialia. 9(2). 5353–5359. 85 indexed citations
20.
Williams, J. C., R. G. Alden, H. A. Murchison, et al.. (1992). Effects of mutations near the bacteriochlorophylls in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry. 31(45). 11029–11037. 135 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026