John M. Lacey

426 total citations
8 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

John M. Lacey is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Lacey has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Accounting, 2 papers in Strategy and Management and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in John M. Lacey's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (1 paper). John M. Lacey is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (1 paper). John M. Lacey collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. John M. Lacey's co-authors include Eric W. Noreen, Robert M. Bowen, Eric Flamholtz, Bjørn Jorgensen, Jonathan Glover, Yuri Biondi, Richard Macve and Nicole Thorne Jenkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, Personnel Review and Accounting in Europe.

In The Last Decade

John M. Lacey

7 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John M. Lacey United States	4	222	188	42	42	39	8	319
Manuel García-Ayuso Covarsí Spain	7	177 0.8×	238 1.3×	20 0.5×	24 0.6×	51 1.3×	24	310
María Paloma Sánchez Muñoz Colombia	7	129 0.6×	205 1.1×	23 0.5×	14 0.3×	63 1.6×	25	279
Peter Gormsen Denmark	3	260 1.2×	331 1.8×	11 0.3×	28 0.7×	15 0.4×	6	392
Ali Ahmadi Tunisia	8	176 0.8×	144 0.8×	30 0.7×	10 0.2×	32 0.8×	26	295
Karla M. Zehms United States	12	353 1.6×	90 0.5×	22 0.5×	61 1.5×	38 1.0×	32	408
Zubaidah Zainal Abidin Malaysia	7	211 1.0×	128 0.7×	28 0.7×	16 0.4×	21 0.5×	15	296
Georgios Voulgaris United Kingdom	10	223 1.0×	137 0.7×	35 0.8×	27 0.6×	16 0.4×	19	281
Linying Zhou United States	7	230 1.0×	108 0.6×	31 0.7×	8 0.2×	28 0.7×	8	294
G P Stapledon Australia	7	264 1.2×	138 0.7×	20 0.5×	7 0.2×	36 0.9×	16	312
Joseph B. Fuller United States	6	218 1.0×	122 0.6×	21 0.5×	15 0.4×	34 0.9×	16	289

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Lacey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Lacey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Lacey. The network helps show where John M. Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Lacey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Lacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Lacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Lacey. John M. Lacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Biondi, Yuri, Jonathan Glover, Nicole Thorne Jenkins, et al.. (2014). ‘Old Hens Make the Best Soup’: Accounting for the Earning Process and the IASB/FASB Attempts to Reform Revenue Recognition Accounting Standards. Accounting in Europe. 11(1). 13–33. 14 indexed citations

2.

Biondi, Yuri, Jonathan Glover, Nicole Thorne Jenkins, et al.. (2014). 'Old Hens Make the Best Soup': Accounting for the Earnings Process and the IASB/FASB Attempts to Reform Revenue Recognition Accounting Standards. 1 indexed citations

3.

Biondi, Yuri, Jonathan Glover, Nicole Thorne Jenkins, et al.. (2012). Comment on IASB/FASB 2011 ED on Revenues from Contracts with Customers. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

4.

Lacey, John M.. (1986). Issues in the perception of auditor independence : a research project commissioned by the chief accountant of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

5.

Lacey, John M.. (1982). Human capital at professional organizations. University Microfilms International eBooks. 1 indexed citations

6.

Flamholtz, Eric & John M. Lacey. (1981). Personnel management, human capital theory, and human resource accounting. 73 indexed citations

7.

Flamholtz, Eric & John M. Lacey. (1981). The Implications of the Economic Theory of Human Capital for Personnel Management. Personnel Review. 10(1). 30–40. 33 indexed citations

8.

Bowen, Robert M., Eric W. Noreen, & John M. Lacey. (1981). Determinants of the corporate decision to capitalize interest. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 3(2). 151–179. 194 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact