John M. Gates
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Daniel S. HollandJames B. HaleLester D. FlakeRonald SpectorStephen R. CrutchfieldKaren Kurotsuchi InkelasJason JonesRussell F. Weigley
- Topics
- Marine and fisheries research (10 papers)Philippine History and Culture (7 papers)Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of Wildlife ManagementAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
John M. Gates
51 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Ecology 242
- Global and Planetary Change 180
- Economics and Econometrics 101
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 83
- Sociology and Political Science 61
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Gates
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Gates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Gates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Gates. The network helps show where John M. Gates may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Gates
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Gates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Gates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Gates. John M. Gates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Evolution of a Fishery Management Plan | 0 |
| 3 | 112 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | Reproduction of an east central Wisconsin pheasant population | 13 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Seasonal movement, winter habitat use, and population distribution of an east central Wisconsin pheasant population | 26 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | The story of an American Communist | 7 |
| 20 | 1 |
About John M. Gates
John M. Gates is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Anthropology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 61 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (10 papers), Philippine History and Culture (7 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (242 citations), Global and Planetary Change (180 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (83 citations). John M. Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Holland, James B. Hale, Lester D. Flake, Ronald Spector, Stephen R. Crutchfield, Karen Kurotsuchi Inkelas, Jason Jones, Russell F. Weigley, Rolf Schneider and Daniel Hug. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of Wildlife Management and American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.