John M. Cosgrove

933 total citations
47 papers, 699 citations indexed

About

John M. Cosgrove is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Cosgrove has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 699 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 7 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in John M. Cosgrove's work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (6 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers) and Granular flow and fluidized beds (4 papers). John M. Cosgrove is often cited by papers focused on Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (6 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers) and Granular flow and fluidized beds (4 papers). John M. Cosgrove collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. John M. Cosgrove's co-authors include Daniel T. Farkas, Jon R. Cohen, Kamal Nagpal, Shawn Garber, Vinay Singhal, Michael M. Herskowitz, Salvatore J. A. Sclafani, Eric K. Hoffer, Jay E. Gold and Ira M. Nathan and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Annals of Surgery and Fuel.

In The Last Decade

John M. Cosgrove

45 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

John M. Cosgrove
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Surgery 358
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 284
  • Emergency Medicine 138
  • Oncology 126
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 56
Replace Kurt P. Schropp with:
Kurt P. Schropp United States
Julia Grabowski United States
Nitsana Spigland United States
Martin Corbally Ireland
Chandra Shekhar Agrawal Nepal
Andreana Bütter Canada
Maurizio Cardi Italy
David Crabbe United Kingdom
David W. Gelfand United States
Wen‐Yao Yin Taiwan
Kurt P. Schropp United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John M. Cosgrove
John M. Cosgrove · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John M. Cosgrove
John M. Cosgrove · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Cosgrove

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Cosgrove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Cosgrove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Cosgrove more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Cosgrove

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Cosgrove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Cosgrove. The network helps show where John M. Cosgrove may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Cosgrove

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Cosgrove. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Cosgrove based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Cosgrove. John M. Cosgrove is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 15
3 15
4 28
5 28
6 29
7 10
8 7
9
A rare case of Leiomyoma of extra peritoneal round ligament presenting as inguinal hernia
3
10
Synchronous lingual and thyroid metastasis from renal cell carcinoma
3
11 1
12 18
13 24
14 24
15 58
16 48
17 9
18 2
19 3
20 7

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026