Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Graphical Methods for Data Analysis.
19841.8k citationsM. J. R. Healy, John M. Chambers et al.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General)profile →
Nonlinear Parameter Estimation
19751.7k citationsJohn M. Chambers et al.Technometricsprofile →
Statistical Models in S
19901.4k citationsJohn M. Chambers et al.profile →
Graphical Methods for Data Analysis.
19841.4k citationsJohn M. Chambers, William S. Cleveland et al.profile →
Multivariate Statistical Methods.
1967686 citationsJohn M. Chambers et al.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Chambers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Chambers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Chambers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Chambers. The network helps show where John M. Chambers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Chambers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Chambers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Chambers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Chambers. John M. Chambers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Becker, Richard A., John M. Chambers, & Allan R. Wilks. (2018). The New S Language.46 indexed citations
2.
Chambers, John M.. (2017). Extending R.3 indexed citations
3.
Chambers, John M.. (2008). The Future of Statistical Computing. Comment.. 50(4). 435–436.
4.
Chambers, John M.. (2008). Software for Data Analysis. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).211 indexed citations
Healy, M. J. R., John M. Chambers, William S. Cleveland, Brian M. Kleiner, & Paul A. Tukey. (1984). Graphical Methods for Data Analysis.. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General). 147(3). 513–513.1756 indexed citations breakdown →
Nelder, J. A. & John M. Chambers. (1978). Computational Methods for Data Analysis.. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General). 141(4). 550–550.50 indexed citations
Chambers, John M. & Agnes M. Herzberg. (1968). A Note on the Game of Refereeing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics). 17(3). 260–260.4 indexed citations
20.
Chambers, John M., et al.. (1967). Random Number Generators.. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General). 130(1). 123–123.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.