John M. Canty
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 0.5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Surgery top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- James A. FallavollitaGen SuzukiTechung LeeRebeccah F. YoungBrian R. WeilF. J. KlockeFrancis J. KlockeThomas P. Smith
- Topics
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (61 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (57 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (36 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
John M. Canty
142 papers receiving 5.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3.5k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.1k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Surgery 1.4k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 695
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Canty
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Canty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Canty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Canty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Canty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Canty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Canty. The network helps show where John M. Canty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Canty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Canty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Canty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Canty. John M. Canty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 112 | |
| 5 | 86 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 279 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 59 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About John M. Canty
John M. Canty is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 146 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (61 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (57 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.1k citations) and Genetics (468 citations). John M. Canty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James A. Fallavollita, Gen Suzuki, Techung Lee, Rebeccah F. Young, Brian R. Weil, F. J. Klocke, Francis J. Klocke, Thomas P. Smith, Vijay Iyer and Robert E. Mates. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.