John M. Burkey
Impact in
- Otorhinolaryngology top 1%
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
-
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media 19
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 3
- Co-authors
- William H. Lippy (23 shared papers)Leonard P. Berenholz (17 shared papers)Arnold G. Schuring (11 shared papers)Franklin M. Rizer (10 shared papers)Robert A. Battista (1 shared paper)Michael J. Fucci (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Otology & Neurotology (8 papers)The Laryngoscope (6 papers)Otolaryngology (3 papers)Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America (1 paper)The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaGermany
In The Last Decade
John M. Burkey
27 papers receiving 369 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Otorhinolaryngology 302
- Sensory Systems 31
- Neurology 43
- Cognitive Neuroscience 52
- Neurology 26
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Burkey
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Burkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Burkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Burkey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Burkey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Burkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Burkey. The network helps show where John M. Burkey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside John M. Burkey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 69 | |
| 2 | Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test. | 1998 | 35 |
| 3 | 1998 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 22 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 18 | Word recognition score changes after stapedectomy for far advanced otosclerosis. | 1998 | 7 |
| 19 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 6 |
About John M. Burkey
John M. Burkey is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery, Oncology and Sensory Systems, having authored 28 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (19 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (2 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (1 paper), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (1 paper) and Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (302 citations), Sensory Systems (31 citations), Neurology (43 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (52 citations) and Neurology (26 citations). John M. Burkey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William H. Lippy, Leonard P. Berenholz, Arnold G. Schuring, Franklin M. Rizer, Robert A. Battista and Michael J. Fucci. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, The Laryngoscope, Otolaryngology, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America and The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.