John Lurquin

477 citations
8 papers · 313 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

John Lurquin

7 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

John Lurquin
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Applied Psychology 125
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 135
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 111
  • Social Psychology 67
Replace Nicholas P. Carruth with:
Nicholas P. Carruth United States
Alexander Jaudas Germany
Robert Schnuerch Germany
Dongil Chung South Korea
Katy Y. Y. Tam Hong Kong
Johanna Habicht United Kingdom
Conor M. Steckler Canada
Tal Moran Israel
Maayan Katzir Israel
Gabriela S. Blum Germany
John Lurquin relative to Nicholas P. Carruth United States Nicholas P. Carruth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Nicholas P. Carruth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Lurquin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lurquin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lurquin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lurquin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lurquin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lurquin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lurquin. The network helps show where John Lurquin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Lurquin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Lurquin Line = papers co-authored together John Lurquin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016101
2 201787
3 201762
4 202124
5 201922
6 201415
7 20162
8 20230

About John Lurquin

John Lurquin is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Mind wandering and attention (2 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (1 paper) and Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (125 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (135 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations) and Social Psychology (67 citations). John Lurquin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Akira Miyake, Claudia C. von Bastian, Nicholas P. Carruth, Daniel E. Gustavson, Laura Michaelson, Jane E. Barker, Michael J. Kane, Bridget A. Smeekens, Sandra L. McFadden and Colin R. Harbke. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, PLoS ONE, Memory & Cognition, The Journal of Social Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact