Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting
19582.3k citationsJohn Lund et al.Hydrobiologiaprofile →
Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2015 worldwide review
This map shows the geographic impact of John Lund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lund more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lund. The network helps show where John Lund may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Lund
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Lund.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Lund based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Lund. John Lund is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lund, John & Mark L. Lawall. (2023). Pottery in the Archaeological Record: Greece and Beyond. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Lund, John, et al.. (2015). The Trading Networks of Ancient Rough Cilicia. Ministry of Culture Research Portal.2 indexed citations
7.
Poblome, Jeroen, et al.. (2006). Old pottery in a new century : innovating perspectives on Roman pottery studies : atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Catania, 22-24 aprile 2004.5 indexed citations
Lund, John, et al.. (2004). Transport amphorae and trade in the Eastern Mediterranean: acts of the International Colloquium at the Danish Institute at Athens, September 26-29, 2002. Aarhus University Press eBooks.25 indexed citations
10.
Lund, John. (2003). Eastern Sigillata B : a ceramic fine ware industry in the political and commercial landscape of the Eastern Mediterranean. 15(1). 125–136.6 indexed citations
11.
Lund, John. (1999). Geothermal uses in Klamath Falls, Oregon. 69–76.1 indexed citations
Lund, John. (1986). The habitation quarters. Munksgaard eBooks.1 indexed citations
16.
Haworth, Elizabeth Y. & John Lund. (1984). Lake sediments and environmental history. Studies in palaeolimnology and palaeoecology in honour of Winifred Tutin..56 indexed citations
17.
Lund, John. (1981). Investigations on phytoplankton with special reference to water usage. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 68–9.13 indexed citations
18.
Lund, John. (1980). Direct utilization of geothermal energy in the Peoples Republic of China. Geothermal Energy. 8. 4–10.1 indexed citations
19.
Lund, John. (1972). Eutrophication. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 180(1061). 371–382.35 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.