John Lind

2.9k citations
85 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 26

John Lind

81 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John Lind
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 382
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 680
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 928
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 199
  • Pharmacy 103
Replace Hans Versmold with:
Hans Versmold Germany
Leo Stern Canada
O Linderkamp Germany
Arnold C.G. Platzker United States
M. Weninger Austria
Gabriel Duc Switzerland
H. Devlieger Belgium
Leon I. Mann United States
Ian Gross United States
Peter Gruenwald United States
John Lind relative to Hans Versmold Germany Hans Versmold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hans Versmold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Lind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lind. The network helps show where John Lind may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Lind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Lind Line = papers co-authored together John Lind links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19921
2 197122
3 19713
4 196911
5 1968106
6 196717
7 196742
8
Quantitative studies of the human neonatal circulation. 3. Observations on the newborn infants central circulatory responses to moderate hypovolemia.
196730
9 196661
10
Newborn infant cry : a collection of articles
19652
11 196550
12 196560
13 19608
14 195968
15 19591
16 19582
17 195824
18 195848
19 195421
20 195214

About John Lind

John Lind is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacy and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (33 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (22 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (11 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (7 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (6 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (6 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers) and Infant Health and Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (382 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (680 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (928 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (199 citations) and Pharmacy (103 citations). John Lind has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William Oh, Robert Usher, Michael Shephard, G. Wallgren, C Wegelius, Robert E. Greenberg, Forrest H. Adams, James F. Bosma, John S. Hanson and Alice C. Yao. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Paediatrica, PEDIATRICS, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026