John Lind

81 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

John Lind
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 393
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 678
  • Pharmacy 153
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 938
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 213
Replace HANS T. VERSMOLD with:
HANS T. VERSMOLD Germany
Leo Stern Canada
Otwin Linderkamp Germany
Arnold C.G. Platzker United States
Thomas Hegyi United States
Elliot Anthony Shinebourne United Kingdom
Max Perlman Canada
Renato Natale Canada
Anthony J. Barson United Kingdom
Herbert Koffler United States
John Lind relative to HANS T. VERSMOLD Germany HANS T. VERSMOLD's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
HANS T. VERSMOLD · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Lind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lind. The network helps show where John Lind may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Lind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Lind Line = papers co-authored together John Lind links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1963231
2 1968122
3 1969117
4 1957104
5 195794
6 195988
7 196686
8 198582
9 196676
10 196566
11 196561
12 196753
13 195852
14 196646
15 196344
16 196644
17 196142
18 196742
19
Catecholamines in tissues of the human fetus.
196139
20
Quantitative studies of the human neonatal circulation. 3. Observations on the newborn infants central circulatory responses to moderate hypovolemia.
196735

About John Lind

John Lind is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pharmacy, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (33 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (22 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (13 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (7 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (7 papers), Infant Health and Development (6 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (6 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (393 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (678 citations), Pharmacy (153 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (938 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (213 citations). John Lind has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William K. Oh, Robert H. Usher, Michael Shephard, G. Wallgren, Forrest H. Adams, Robert E. Greenberg, C Wegelius, James F. Bosma, John S. Hanson and Ira H. Gessner. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Paediatrica, PEDIATRICS, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and European Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact