John Lin

502 citations
35 papers · 400 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John Lin

33 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

John Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 194
  • Aerospace Engineering 170
  • Polymers and Plastics 69
  • Mechanical Engineering 168
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 50
Replace Stephen Scarborough with:
Stephen Scarborough United States
Thomas W. Murphey United States
Ryan Stephan United States
Thomas Murphey United States
Wanping Zheng Canada
Eric Ruggiero United States
Honghao Yue China
C. Poteet United States
L. Datashvili Germany
Koichi Kibe Japan
John Lin relative to Stephen Scarborough United States Stephen Scarborough's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Stephen Scarborough · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lin. The network helps show where John Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Lin Line = papers co-authored together John Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200742
2 200637
3 200032
4 200329
5 200625
6 200224
7 199920
8 200118
9 199917
10 200214
11 200211
12 201111
13 200411
14 201011
15 200610
16 201210
17 20089
18 20098
19 20098
20
Flexible Material Systems Testing
20108

About John Lin

John Lin is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mechanical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 35 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Structural Analysis and Optimization (17 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (14 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (9 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (8 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (5 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (5 papers), Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry (4 papers) and Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Civil and Structural Engineering (194 citations), Aerospace Engineering (170 citations), Polymers and Plastics (69 citations), Mechanical Engineering (168 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (50 citations). John Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David Cadogan, Stephen Scarborough, Houfei Fang, E. Im, James D. Moore, John Huang, Mark Thomson, Todd Peterson, Suraj Rawal and Ron Schulze. Their work appears in journals such as Materials Science and Engineering B, Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Applied Physics Express and GIScience & Remote Sensing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact