John Liang
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Neurology top 5%
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 7
- Co-authors
- Mandip S. Dhamoon (12 shared papers)J Mocco (12 shared papers)Christopher P. Kellner (16 shared papers)Neha Dangayach (13 shared papers)Laura Stein (6 shared papers)Stanley Tuhrim (8 shared papers)Dominic Nistal (4 shared papers)Natalie Wilson (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurology (7 papers)Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (6 papers)World Neurosurgery (5 papers)Stroke (4 papers)Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaCanada
In The Last Decade
John Liang
50 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Internal Medicine 67
- Neurology 195
- Rehabilitation 48
- Emergency Medicine 59
- Epidemiology 186
Countries citing papers authored by John Liang
This map shows the geographic impact of John Liang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Liang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Liang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Liang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Liang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Liang. The network helps show where John Liang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Liang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 64 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 7 |
About John Liang
John Liang is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Internal Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 53 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (19 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (13 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (11 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (9 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (6 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (6 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (67 citations), Neurology (195 citations), Rehabilitation (48 citations), Emergency Medicine (59 citations) and Epidemiology (186 citations). John Liang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mandip S. Dhamoon, J Mocco, Christopher P. Kellner, Neha Dangayach, Laura Stein, Stanley Tuhrim, Dominic Nistal, Natalie Wilson, Muhammad Ali and Johanna T Fifi. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, World Neurosurgery, Stroke and Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.