John J. Stapleton

53 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

John J. Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Rehabilitation 318
  • Occupational Therapy 146
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 402
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 193
  • Surgery 196
Replace Nicholas J. Lowery with:
Nicholas J. Lowery United States
Venu Kavarthapu United Kingdom
Jakob C. Thorud United States
Natalie C. Suder United States
Wenjay Sung United States
LA Lavery United States
Tessa E. Busch‐Westbroek Netherlands
R Sullivan United States
Heikki-Jussi Laine Finland
Devaka Fernando United Kingdom
John J. Stapleton relative to Nicholas J. Lowery United States Nicholas J. Lowery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nicholas J. Lowery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Stapleton. The network helps show where John J. Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John J. Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together John J. Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200738
2 201233
3 200832
4 201032
5 200824
6 200924
7 200823
8 200822
9 200920
10 201019
11 200718
12 200516
13 200816
14 200716
15 200913
16 201413
17 200812
18 200712
19 196612
20 201011

About John J. Stapleton

John J. Stapleton is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rehabilitation, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Occupational Therapy, having authored 54 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (33 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (24 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (22 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (11 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (10 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (318 citations), Occupational Therapy (146 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (402 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (193 citations) and Surgery (196 citations). John J. Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Zgonis, Thomas S. Roukis, Ronald Belczyk, Crystal L. Ramanujam, Douglas T. Cromack, Ryan T. Hagino, Jordan P. Grossman, Naohiro Shibuya, Nicholas J. Bevilacqua and Lawrence A. DiDomenico. Their work appears in journals such as Foot & Ankle Specialist, Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, AORN Journal, Journal of Wound Care and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact