Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by John I. Loewenstein
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John I. Loewenstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John I. Loewenstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John I. Loewenstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John I. Loewenstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John I. Loewenstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John I. Loewenstein. The network helps show where John I. Loewenstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John I. Loewenstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John I. Loewenstein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John I. Loewenstein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John I. Loewenstein. John I. Loewenstein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Montezuma, Sandra R., John I. Loewenstein, Carmen Scholz, & Joseph F. Rizzo. (2004). BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF SUBRETINAL MATERIALS IN YUCATAN PIGS. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 4169–4169.2 indexed citations
9.
Sun, Jennifer K., et al.. (2004). PROGRESS TOWARD A MINIMALLY INVASIVE, AB EXTERNO TECHNIQUE FOR SUBRETINAL PROSTHETIC IMPLANTATION. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 4190–4190.1 indexed citations
10.
Iaccheri, Barbara, Tito Fiore, Sofia Androudi, et al.. (2004). Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE): final outcome and visual prognosis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 2692–2692.1 indexed citations
11.
Reddy, Harsha, John I. Loewenstein, Anne Marie Lane, & Lucy Q. Shen. (2004). Peripapillary Choroidal Neovascularization. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 3077–3077.1 indexed citations
12.
Wyatt, John L., et al.. (2004). DEVELOPMENT OF A WIRELESS, AB EXTERNO RETINAL PROSTHESIS. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 3399–3399.4 indexed citations
13.
Loewenstein, John I.. (2004). Outer Retinal Degeneration. Archives of Ophthalmology. 122(4). 587–587.82 indexed citations
14.
Rizzo, Joseph F., Ralph J. Jensen, John I. Loewenstein, & John L. Wyatt. (2003). Unexpectedly Small Percepts Evoked by Epi-Retinal Electrical Stimulation in Blind Humans. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 4207–4207.8 indexed citations
15.
Shire, D. B., Marcus D. Gingerich, Luke Theogarajan, et al.. (2003). Packaging Development for Retinal Prostheses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 5084–5084.1 indexed citations
16.
Loewenstein, John I., et al.. (2002). Micromachined Tacks to Attach a Prosthesis to the Retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 4482–4482.
17.
Zacks, David N., Lucy H. Young, Shizuo Mukai, et al.. (2002). Traumatic Choroidal Rupture: Visual Outcome and Treatment of Choroidalneovascular Membranes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 4491–4491.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.