John H. Teeter

58 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

John H. Teeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Sensory Systems 1.2k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 1.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 977
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 373
  • Aquatic Science 168
Replace John Caprio with:
John Caprio United States
Anne Hansen United States
Barry W. Ache United States
Simon C. Harvey United Kingdom
B. W. Ache United States
Liliane Astic France
David G. Moulton United States
Lloyd M. Beidler United States
Jorge A. Flores United States
L.E.L. Rasmussen United States
John H. Teeter relative to John Caprio United States John Caprio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John Caprio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Teeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Teeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Teeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Teeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Teeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Teeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Teeter. The network helps show where John H. Teeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John H. Teeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John H. Teeter Line = papers co-authored together John H. Teeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990246
2 1985172
3 2000146
4 1980118
5 1996104
6 1993101
7 199270
8 199866
9 199664
10 199361
11 199260
12 200357
13 199256
14 199355
15 200950
16 198050
17 198049
18 199447
19 199146
20 199938

About John H. Teeter

John H. Teeter is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (26 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (25 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (16 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (8 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers) and Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.2k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (977 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (373 citations) and Aquatic Science (168 citations). John H. Teeter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Diego Restrepo, Joseph G. Brand, Takenori Miyamoto, Bruce P. Bryant, Peter B. Johnsen, Wayne L. Silver, Weiming Li, Takashi Kumazawa, Detlev Schild and Yukio Okada. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, Chemical Senses, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Brain Research and The Journal of General Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact