John H. Smith

20 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

John H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Rehabilitation 51
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 43
  • Surgery 180
  • Reproductive Medicine 34
  • Emergency Medicine 30
Replace J. Gielen with:
J. Gielen Belgium
Shabnam Bhandari Grover India
Badr AbdullGaffar United Arab Emirates
C. Piroth France
J Martin United States
KJ Stuck United States
S. Quiroga Spain
Kevin T. Moran United States
Yaşar Ünlü Türkiye
S. Yagel Israel
John H. Smith relative to J. Gielen Belgium J. Gielen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. Gielen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Smith. The network helps show where John H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together John H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198768
2 198548
3
Infection and cervical neoplasia: facts and fiction.
200936
4 202028
5 198526
6 198526
7 201022
8 201918
9 201317
10 201717
11 201116
12 199514
13 199212
14 198711
15
Histopathology reporting in cervical screening – an integrated approach
20128
16 20157
17 20163
18 20211
19 20141
20 19661

About John H. Smith

John H. Smith is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers) and AI in cancer detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (51 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (43 citations), Surgery (180 citations), Reproductive Medicine (34 citations) and Emergency Medicine (30 citations). John H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wael Al‐Daraji, Ronald L. Linscheid, James H. Dobyns, John M. Rayhack, W. Glenn McCluggage, A Oakhill, Philip Darbyshire, Eric C. McCarty, Stephen G. Thon and Quentin R. Stiles. Their work appears in journals such as Histopathology, The Journal Of Hand Surgery, Health Technology Assessment, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology and The American Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact