John H. Pyne
Impact in
- Dermatology top 5%
- Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
-
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Papers in
- Epidemiology 16
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies 16
- Dermatology 12
- Cancer and Skin Lesions 9
- Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research 3
- Co-authors
- Lei Liu (5 shared papers)Graham J.W. King (5 shared papers)Shailendra Anoopkumar‐Dukie (5 shared papers)Simon Clark (9 shared papers)Michael David (4 shared papers)Tony Dicker (2 shared papers)Renhua Na (3 shared papers)Vilı́m Šimánek (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Cutaneous Pathology (4 papers)Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (2 papers)Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research (1 paper)International Journal of Molecular Sciences (1 paper)Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
John H. Pyne
21 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Dermatology 135
- Epidemiology 166
- Oncology 110
- Pharmacology 60
- Small Animals 20
Countries citing papers authored by John H. Pyne
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Pyne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Pyne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Pyne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Pyne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Pyne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Pyne. The network helps show where John H. Pyne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside John H. Pyne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 2 |
About John H. Pyne
John H. Pyne is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Dermatology, Oncology, Small Animals and Molecular Biology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (16 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (9 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (5 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (5 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (4 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (3 papers) and Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (135 citations), Epidemiology (166 citations), Oncology (110 citations), Pharmacology (60 citations) and Small Animals (20 citations). John H. Pyne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lei Liu, Graham J.W. King, Shailendra Anoopkumar‐Dukie, Simon Clark, Michael David, Tony Dicker, Renhua Na, Vilı́m Šimánek, Giuseppe Argenziano and Aimilios Lallas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.