John H. Lewis
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Eunjoon KimRoderick MacKinnonD. DoyleAlice A. LeeMorgan ShengRama RanganathanE. Michael OstapHenry Shuman
- Topics
- Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (7 papers)Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
John H. Lewis
19 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Cell Biology 638
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 420
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 416
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 139
Countries citing papers authored by John H. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Lewis. The network helps show where John H. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Lewis. John H. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 91 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 182 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 96 | |
| 18 | 252 | |
| 19 | Crystal Structures of a Complexed and Peptide-Free Membrane Protein–Binding Domain: Molecular Basis of Peptide Recognition by PDZbreakdown → | 960 |
| 20 | Squamous cell carcinoma of the great toe. | 7 |
About John H. Lewis
John H. Lewis is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biophysics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (7 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (638 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (420 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.3k citations). John H. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Eunjoon Kim, Roderick MacKinnon, D. Doyle, Alice A. Lee, Morgan Sheng, Roderick MacKinnon, Rama Ranganathan, E. Michael Ostap, Henry Shuman and Joseph M. Laakso. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.