John Garner

21.2k citations
3 papers · 298 · h-index 3

Impact in

    • Genomics and Rare Diseases
    • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology

Papers in

    • Gene expression and cancer classification 2
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 2
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 1
    • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis 1
    • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 1
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 1
    • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 1

John Garner

3 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

John Garner
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Genetics 142
  • Aging 6
  • Cancer Research 46
  • Molecular Biology 208
  • Neurology 7
Replace Sunita Kawane with:
Sunita Kawane United States
Guang-Yao Fan China
Mirjana Gušić Germany
Ke Zhao China
Santiago Morell Spain
Antonis Tatarakis United States
L.A. Shepel United States
Zachary Zappala United States
Jyothi Thota United States
Kristilyn Eliason United States
John Garner relative to Sunita Kawane United States Sunita Kawane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sunita Kawane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Garner. The network helps show where John Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John Garner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Garner Line = papers co-authored together John Garner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown

About John Garner

John Garner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 3 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (1 paper), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (1 paper) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (142 citations), Aging (6 citations), Cancer Research (46 citations), Molecular Biology (208 citations) and Neurology (7 citations). John Garner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Supriyo De, Kevin G. Becker, Paul Flicek, Ilkka Lappalainen, Michael E. Maguire, Chao Chen, John Lopez, Timothy Hefferon, George Zhou and Justin Paschall. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological Genomics, BMC Medical Genomics and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact