John Frederick

555 total citations
27 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

John Frederick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Frederick has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Clinical Psychology, 12 papers in General Health Professions and 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in John Frederick's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers). John Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers). John Frederick collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. John Frederick's co-authors include Chris Goddard, John Devaney, Trevor Spratt, Eva Alisic, Peter Sidebotham, James Fraser, Edwin A. Mitchell, Revathi N. Krishna, Jennifer Oxley and Rebecca Newton and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review and Journal of Family Violence.

In The Last Decade

John Frederick

26 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Frederick Australia 10 223 113 111 69 50 27 332
Miriam Maclean Australia 10 304 1.4× 157 1.4× 101 0.9× 178 2.6× 42 0.8× 19 413
Aislinn Conrad United States 7 203 0.9× 95 0.8× 58 0.5× 46 0.7× 49 1.0× 15 256
Nick Hindley United Kingdom 8 353 1.6× 126 1.1× 103 0.9× 109 1.6× 80 1.6× 18 428
Joanne Filippelli Canada 11 292 1.3× 153 1.4× 81 0.7× 123 1.8× 68 1.4× 25 355
Eric Hadley-Ives United States 7 178 0.8× 166 1.5× 87 0.8× 51 0.7× 68 1.4× 8 329
M. A Lynch United Kingdom 9 154 0.7× 112 1.0× 108 1.0× 37 0.5× 33 0.7× 12 325
Carmela J. DeCandia United States 9 151 0.7× 189 1.7× 72 0.6× 25 0.4× 24 0.5× 13 281
Tanya J. Quille United States 5 175 0.8× 135 1.2× 46 0.4× 50 0.7× 50 1.0× 6 312
Elizabeth K. Drake United States 6 108 0.5× 91 0.8× 137 1.2× 20 0.3× 12 0.2× 12 290
Melissa Strompolis United States 12 378 1.7× 216 1.9× 46 0.4× 44 0.6× 50 1.0× 30 467

Countries citing papers authored by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frederick. The network helps show where John Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Frederick. John Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
3.
Frederick, John, Trevor Spratt, & John Devaney. (2023). Supportive Relationships with Trusted Adults for Children and Young People Who Have Experienced Adversities: Implications for Social Work Service Provision. The British Journal of Social Work. 53(6). 3129–3145. 8 indexed citations
4.
Devaney, John, John Frederick, & Trevor Spratt. (2020). Opening the Time Capsule of ACEs: Reflections on How we Conceptualise Children’s Experiences of Adversity and the Issue of Temporality. The British Journal of Social Work. 51(6). 2247–2263. 9 indexed citations
5.
Frederick, John, John Devaney, & Eva Alisic. (2019). Homicides and Maltreatment‐related Deaths of Disabled Children: A Systematic Review. Child Abuse Review. 28(5). 321–338. 17 indexed citations
6.
Spratt, Trevor, John Devaney, & John Frederick. (2019). Adverse Childhood Experiences: Beyond Signs of Safety; Reimagining the Organisation and Practice of Social Work with Children and Families. The British Journal of Social Work. 49(8). 2042–2058. 31 indexed citations
7.
Saunders, Bernadette J., et al.. (2019). Understanding Children’s Court Processes and Decisions: Perceptions of Children and Their Families. Youth Justice. 20(3). 272–292. 1 indexed citations
8.
Alisic, Eva, et al.. (2015). Children’s Mental Health and Well-Being After Parental Intimate Partner Homicide: A Systematic Review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 18(4). 328–345. 39 indexed citations
9.
Broadley, Karen, et al.. (2014). The Silencing of Children in Australia. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
10.
Fraser, James, et al.. (2014). Learning from child death review in the USA, England, Australia, and New Zealand. The Lancet. 384(9946). 894–903. 76 indexed citations
11.
Frederick, John, Chris Goddard, & Jennifer Oxley. (2012). What is the ‘dark figure’ of child homicide and how can it be addressed in Australia?. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion. 20(3). 209–217. 7 indexed citations
12.
Newton, Rebecca, et al.. (2010). Legislation and child death review processes in Australia: Understanding our failure to prevent child death. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 8 indexed citations
13.
Frederick, John & Chris Goddard. (2010). ‘School was just a nightmare’: childhood abuse and neglect and school experiences. Child & Family Social Work. 15(1). 22–30. 19 indexed citations
14.
Frederick, John. (2010). Safeguarding Children Living with Trauma and Family Violence: Evidence‐based Assessment, Analysis and Planning Interventions. Child & Family Social Work. 15(2). 259–260. 11 indexed citations
15.
Frederick, John & Chris Goddard. (2009). ‘It’s been really, really hard’: a qualitative study of the health problems of people receiving emergency relief in Australia. Health & Social Care in the Community. 17(6). 581–589. 2 indexed citations
16.
Frederick, John & Chris Goddard. (2008). Sweet and Sour Charity: Experiences of Receiving Emergency Relief in Australia. Australian Social Work. 61(3). 269–284. 18 indexed citations
17.
Frederick, John & Chris Goddard. (2008). Living on an island: consequences of childhood abuse, attachment disruption and adversity in later life. Child & Family Social Work. 13(3). 300–310. 23 indexed citations
18.
Frederick, John & Chris Goddard. (2007). Exploring the relationship between poverty, childhood adversity and child abuse from the perspective of adulthood. Child Abuse Review. 16(5). 323–341. 29 indexed citations
19.
Frederick, John & Anand Tamang. (2006). Asylums of exploitation: internally displaced children in the worst forms of child labour due to the armed conflict in Nepal.. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations
20.
Frederick, John, et al.. (1994). Why Be Moral?: The Egoistic Challenge. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026