John Frederick

555 citations
27 papers · 332 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Frederick

26 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

John Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Clinical Psychology 223
  • Safety Research 69
  • Health 50
  • Public Administration 19
  • General Health Professions 113
Replace M. A Lynch with:
M. A Lynch United Kingdom
Nick Hindley United Kingdom
Miriam Maclean Australia
Megan M. Letson United States
Aislinn Conrad United States
Joanne Filippelli Canada
Eric Hadley-Ives United States
Carmela J. DeCandia United States
Neil J. Hochstadt United States
Josianne Lamothe Canada
John Frederick relative to M. A Lynch United Kingdom M. A Lynch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
M. A Lynch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frederick. The network helps show where John Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Frederick Line = papers co-authored together John Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201476
2 201539
3 201931
4 200729
5 200823
6 201019
7 200818
8 201917
9 201011
10 200610
11 20209
12
Legislation and child death review processes in Australia: Understanding our failure to prevent child death
20108
13 20238
14 20127
15 20206
16 20225
17 20243
18 20092
19
Why Be Moral?: The Egoistic Challenge
19942
20
Child death in high-income countries 1 Learning from child death review in the USA, England, Australia, and New Zealand
20142

About John Frederick

John Frederick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (10 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (223 citations), Safety Research (69 citations), Health (50 citations), Public Administration (19 citations) and General Health Professions (113 citations). John Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Chris Goddard, John Devaney, Trevor Spratt, Eva Alisic, Peter Sidebotham, James Fraser, Edwin A. Mitchell, Revathi N. Krishna, Mark Dibben and Rebecca Newton. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Child Abuse Review, Child & Family Social Work, Youth Justice and Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact