John Fox

6.2k total citations · 3 hit papers
73 papers, 4.6k citations indexed

About

John Fox is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Statistics and Probability and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, John Fox has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 4.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 11 papers in Statistics and Probability and 10 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in John Fox's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers). John Fox is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers). John Fox collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. John Fox's co-authors include Sanford Weisberg, Caroline Davis, Jeffrey R. Spies, Timothy C. Bates, Michael C. Neale, Ryne Estabrook, Paras Mehta, Steven M. Boker, Sarah Kenny and Michael Spiegel and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

John Fox

69 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Hit Papers

OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Model... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2011 2005 2018 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Fox United States 30 934 773 692 566 478 73 4.6k
James Roger United Kingdom 18 427 0.5× 537 0.7× 424 0.6× 585 1.0× 271 0.6× 46 5.2k
Indrajeet Patil Germany 19 613 0.7× 1.1k 1.4× 817 1.2× 387 0.7× 302 0.6× 29 5.0k
Mattan S. Ben‐Shachar Israel 10 706 0.8× 1.2k 1.6× 976 1.4× 365 0.6× 367 0.8× 23 5.7k
Philip Waggoner United States 13 568 0.6× 901 1.2× 736 1.1× 266 0.5× 233 0.5× 34 4.1k
Steven Vogel United Kingdom 37 563 0.6× 884 1.1× 770 1.1× 570 1.0× 121 0.3× 193 7.3k
Martin Maechler United States 11 973 1.0× 1.4k 1.8× 1.3k 1.9× 465 0.8× 113 0.2× 22 5.1k
Kent G. Bailey United States 11 753 0.8× 1.2k 1.6× 973 1.4× 569 1.0× 151 0.3× 43 4.1k
N. J. D. Nagelkerke Netherlands 13 511 0.5× 651 0.8× 263 0.4× 203 0.4× 323 0.7× 25 5.1k
George A. Milliken United States 38 1.3k 1.3× 1.7k 2.1× 948 1.4× 1.9k 3.3× 201 0.4× 187 10.4k
Paul‐Christian Bürkner Germany 27 777 0.8× 1.2k 1.5× 768 1.1× 264 0.5× 714 1.5× 109 8.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fox. The network helps show where John Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Fox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Fox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Fox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Fox. John Fox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fox, John, et al.. (2019). Comparison of false-positive rates of 2 hypothesis-test approaches in relation to laboratory toxicity test performance. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 38(3). 511–523.
2.
Makris, Susan L., Cheryl Siegel Scott, John Fox, et al.. (2016). A systematic evaluation of the potential effects of trichloroethylene exposure on cardiac development. Reproductive Toxicology. 65. 321–358. 27 indexed citations
3.
Makris, Susan L., Andrew D. Kraft, Ambuja S. Bale, et al.. (2015). Evaluation of the ToxRTool’s ability to rate the reliability of toxicological data for human health hazard assessments. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 72(1). 94–101. 21 indexed citations
4.
Davis, Caroline, et al.. (2010). Is human seasonality implicated in the risk profile for obesity?. Eating Behaviors. 11(4). 301–304. 5 indexed citations
5.
Kopylev, Leonid & John Fox. (2008). Parameters of a Dose‐Response Model Are on the Boundary: What Happens with BMDL?. Risk Analysis. 29(1). 18–25. 4 indexed citations
6.
Davis, Caroline, et al.. (2008). Education level moderates learning on two versions of the Iowa Gambling Task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 14(6). 1063–1068. 38 indexed citations
7.
Fox, John. (2005). The R Commander: A Basic-Statistics Graphical User Interface to R. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 125 indexed citations
8.
Davis, Caroline, Elizabeth Blackmore, Debra K. Katzman, & John Fox. (2004). Female adolescents with anorexia nervosa and their parents: a case-control study of exercise attitudes and behaviours. Psychological Medicine. 35(3). 377–386. 45 indexed citations
9.
Davis, Caroline, et al.. (2004). Looking good—family focus on appearance and the risk for eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 35(2). 136–144. 42 indexed citations
10.
Fox, John. (2002). Structural Equation Models Appendix to An R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression. 14 indexed citations
11.
Davis, Caroline A., Gordon Claridge, & John Fox. (2000). Not just a pretty face: Physical attractiveness and perfectionism in the risk for eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 27(1). 67–73. 48 indexed citations
12.
Fortin, P, et al.. (1997). Clinical and Human Resource Planning for the Downsizing of Psychiatric Hospitals: The British Columbia Experience. Psychiatric Quarterly. 68(1). 25–42. 5 indexed citations
13.
Fox, John. (1993). Size and sex allocation in monoecious woody plants. Oecologia. 94(1). 110–113. 43 indexed citations
14.
Fox, John. (1992). Responses of Diversity and Growth-form Dominance to Fertility in Alaskan Tundra Fellfield Communities. Arctic and Alpine Research. 24(3). 233–237. 2 indexed citations
15.
Fox, John. (1992). Pollen limitation of reproductive effort in willows. Oecologia. 90(2). 283–287. 44 indexed citations
16.
Goldblatt, Peter, John Fox, & David A. Leon. (1991). Mortality of employed men and women. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 20(3). 285–306. 27 indexed citations
17.
Chapin, F. Stuart, John P. Bryant, & John Fox. (1985). Lack of induced chemical defense in juvenile Alaskan woody plants in response to simulated browsing. Oecologia. 67(4). 457–459. 41 indexed citations
18.
Fox, John. (1983). Germinable Seed Banks of Interior Alaskan Tundra. Arctic and Alpine Research. 15(3). 405–411. 4 indexed citations
19.
Fox, John & Keith Van Cleve. (1983). Relationships between cellulose decomposition, Jenny's k, forest-floor nitrogen, and soil temperature in Alaskan taiga forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 13(5). 789–794. 34 indexed citations
20.
Fox, John & A. T. Harrison. (1981). Habitat assortment of sexes and water balance in a dioecious grass. Oecologia. 49(2). 233–235. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026