John F. Haught

767 total citations
32 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

John F. Haught is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Haught has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in John F. Haught's work include Evolution and Science Education (13 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (10 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers). John F. Haught is often cited by papers focused on Evolution and Science Education (13 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (10 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers). John F. Haught collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and United Kingdom. John F. Haught's co-authors include Eugene E. Selk, David C. Lindberg, Simon Conway Morris, Jonathan R. Topham, Michael Ruse, Ronald L. Numbers, Mikael Stenmark, John H. Evans, Peter Harrison and Nancey Murphy and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Physics and Environmental Ethics.

In The Last Decade

John F. Haught

24 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

John F. Haught
Thomas Aquinas United Kingdom
Brad S. Gregory United States
Brian Thomas Swimme United States
Amos Funkenstein United States
Thomas F. Torrance United Kingdom
Don Cupitt United States
Alex Owen United Kingdom
John F. Haught
Citations per year, relative to John F. Haught John F. Haught (= 1×) peers J. Wentzel van Huyssteen

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Haught

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Haught's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Haught with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Haught more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Haught

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Haught. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Haught. The network helps show where John F. Haught may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Haught

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Haught. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Haught based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Haught. John F. Haught is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Haught, John F.. (2023). Natural theology after Darwin. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies. 79(2).
2.
Haught, John F.. (2022). God after Einstein. Yale University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
3.
Haught, John F.. (2018). FAITH AND COMPASSION IN AN UNFINISHED UNIVERSE. Zygon®. 53(3). 1 indexed citations
4.
Haught, John F., et al.. (2014). [인간학 자료 번역문] 다윈 시대 이후 인간의 존엄성. 229–245.
5.
Haught, John F.. (2013). Science and Faith: A New Introduction. 9 indexed citations
6.
Haught, John F.. (2010). IS PHYSICS FUNDAMENTAL? ROBERT RUSSELL ON DIVINE ACTION. Zygon®. 45(1). 2 indexed citations
7.
Haught, John F.. (2010). Robert Ulanowicz and the Possibility of a Theology of Evolution. Axiomathes. 22(2). 261–268. 1 indexed citations
8.
Harrison, Peter, David C. Lindberg, John A. Henry, et al.. (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 28 indexed citations
9.
Haught, John F.. (2009). THEOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND THE HUMAN MIND: HOW MUCH CAN BIOLOGY EXPLAIN?. Zygon®. 44(4). 1 indexed citations
10.
Haught, John F.. (2008). God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 28 indexed citations
11.
Haught, John F.. (2007). Christianity and Science: Toward a Theology of Nature. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12 indexed citations
12.
Haught, John F.. (2007). Darwin and Contemporary Theology. Worldviews Global Religions Culture and Ecology. 11(1). 44–57. 3 indexed citations
13.
Haught, John F.. (2001). Theology after Contact. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 950(1). 296–308. 2 indexed citations
14.
Haught, John F., et al.. (1997). Polanyi's Finalism. Zygon®. 32(4). 1 indexed citations
15.
Haught, John F. & Eugene E. Selk. (1996). Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation. American Journal of Physics. 64(12). 1532–1533. 74 indexed citations
16.
Haught, John F.. (1986). The Emergent Environment and the Problem of Cosmic Purpose. Environmental Ethics. 8(2). 139–150. 2 indexed citations
17.
Haught, John F.. (1986). What Is God?: How to Think about the Divine. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 10 indexed citations
18.
Haught, John F.. (1984). The Cosmic Adventure: Science, Religion and the Quest for Purpose. 6 indexed citations
19.
Haught, John F.. (1976). Religion and Self-Acceptance: A Study of the Relationship Between Belief in God and the Desire to Know. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations
20.
Haught, John F.. (1972). What is Logocentric Theology?. Theological Studies. 33(1). 120–132.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026