John F. Bower

8.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
134 papers, 7.2k citations indexed

About

John F. Bower is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Bower has authored 134 papers receiving a total of 7.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 124 papers in Organic Chemistry, 41 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 28 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in John F. Bower's work include Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (85 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (39 papers) and Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (38 papers). John F. Bower is often cited by papers focused on Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (85 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (39 papers) and Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (38 papers). John F. Bower collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Brazil. John F. Bower's co-authors include Michael J. Krische, Steven J. Stanton, Gabriele Fumagalli, Adele Faulkner, Ryan L. Patman, Giacomo E. M. Crisenza, Nicholas J. Race, Megan H. Shaw, James S. Scott and Olga O. Sokolova and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

In The Last Decade

John F. Bower

126 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Hit Papers

Recent Methodologies That Exploit C–C Single-Bond Cleavag... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 250 500 750

Peers

John F. Bower
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Organic Chemistry 6.8k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 2.3k
  • Molecular Biology 798
  • Pharmaceutical Science 344
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 280
Replace Li‐Xin Dai with:
Li‐Xin Dai China
Fuk Yee Kwong Hong Kong
Enrique Gómez‐Bengoa Spain
Naohiko Yoshikai Singapore
Marc Taillefer France
Arkaitz Correa Spain
Akkattu T. Biju India
Gwilherm Evano France
Olga Garcı́a Mancheño Germany
Xue‐Long Hou China
Li‐Xin Dai China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John F. Bower
John F. Bower · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John F. Bower
John F. Bower · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Bower. The network helps show where John F. Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Bower

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Bower. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Bower based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Bower. John F. Bower is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 0
4 3
5 0
6 0
7 25
8 41
9 11
10 42
11 46
12 28
13 83
14 29
15 33
16 62
17 88
18 11
19 55
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026