John F. Boas
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 2%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John R. PilbrowAlan M. BondJohn BaldasThomas D. SmithJinzhen LuRonald CooperBoujemaa MoubarakiKeith S. Murray
- Topics
- Magnetism in coordination complexes (25 papers)Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (16 papers)Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (16 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological ChemistryAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- AustraliaJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
John F. Boas
98 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
- Inorganic Chemistry 829
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 578
- Organic Chemistry 479
- Oncology 287
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Boas
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Boas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Boas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Boas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Boas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Boas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Boas. The network helps show where John F. Boas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Boas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Boas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Boas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Boas. John F. Boas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 155 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 83 | |
| 14 | 159 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Comparison of thermoluminescence and electron spin resonance as dosimetry methods in the investigation of the dose distribution inside a 137Cs Gammacell-1000 irradiator. | 1 |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About John F. Boas
John F. Boas is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biophysics, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (25 papers), Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (16 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (829 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (578 citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations). John F. Boas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Pilbrow, Alan M. Bond, John Baldas, Thomas D. Smith, Jinzhen Lu, Ronald Cooper, Boujemaa Moubaraki, Keith S. Murray, Geoffrey A. Williams and Suzanne M. Neville. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.