John F. Boas

2.7k citations
99 papers · 2.3k indexed · h-index 27

John F. Boas

98 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

John F. Boas
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Inorganic Chemistry 829
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 578
  • Materials Chemistry 1.2k
  • Biophysics 130
  • Electrochemistry 115
Replace Charles E. Schulz with:
Charles E. Schulz United States
Ivan M. Lorković United States
Leonardo D. Slep Argentina
Achim Zahl Germany
Elia Tfouni Brazil
George B. Richter‐Addo United States
Shigenori Nagatomo Japan
Veronika A. Szalai United States
Thomas R. Halbert United States
James Bourassa United States
John F. Boas relative to Charles E. Schulz United States Charles E. Schulz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Charles E. Schulz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Boas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Boas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Boas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Boas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Boas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Boas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Boas. The network helps show where John F. Boas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John F. Boas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John F. Boas Line = papers co-authored together John F. Boas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201613
2 201436
3 201111
4 201135
5 201118
6 201138
7 201115
8 200953
9 2009155
10 20085
11 20086
12 200649
13 200683
14 2004159
15 19974
16
Comparison of thermoluminescence and electron spin resonance as dosimetry methods in the investigation of the dose distribution inside a 137Cs Gammacell-1000 irradiator.
19941
17 19936
18 19916
19 19863
20 19766

About John F. Boas

John F. Boas is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biophysics, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (25 papers), Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (16 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (16 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (15 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (14 papers), Vanadium and Halogenation Chemistry (10 papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (9 papers) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (829 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (578 citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations). John F. Boas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Pilbrow, Alan M. Bond, John Baldas, Thomas D. Smith, Jinzhen Lu, Ronald Cooper, Boujemaa Moubaraki, Keith S. Murray, Geoffrey A. Williams and Suzanne M. Neville. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026