John Ellis

1.2k total citations
9 papers, 823 citations indexed

About

John Ellis is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, John Ellis has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 823 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 6 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 1 paper in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in John Ellis's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (8 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers). John Ellis is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (8 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers). John Ellis collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. John Ellis's co-authors include R. L. Jaffe, Graciela B. Gelmini, Jorge L. Lopez, D.V. Nanopoulos, S. Sarkar, Keith A. Olive, Yudi Santoso, Vassilis C. Spanos, G. L. Fogli and H. Kowalski and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.

In The Last Decade

John Ellis

9 papers receiving 808 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Ellis Switzerland	8	806	356	34	15	12	9	823
J.-M. Gérard Belgium	17	1.1k 1.4×	147 0.4×	35 1.0×	14 0.9×	9 0.8×	29	1.1k
M. Magg Germany	8	955 1.2×	215 0.6×	36 1.1×	28 1.9×	6 0.5×	14	977
J. R. Cudell Belgium	17	872 1.1×	131 0.4×	29 0.9×	6 0.4×	18 1.5×	66	928
J.F. Gunion United States	7	587 0.7×	106 0.3×	19 0.6×	28 1.9×	9 0.8×	10	598
R. Konoplich Russia	16	491 0.6×	309 0.9×	35 1.0×	46 3.1×	6 0.5×	41	538
Camila S. Machado Brazil	11	438 0.5×	214 0.6×	40 1.2×	19 1.3×	19 1.6×	12	470
C. Geng Taiwan	21	1.2k 1.5×	110 0.3×	43 1.3×	25 1.7×	7 0.6×	78	1.2k
Miha Nemevšek Slovenia	19	1.5k 1.9×	369 1.0×	42 1.2×	24 1.6×	20 1.7×	36	1.6k
Yael Shadmi Israel	20	964 1.2×	400 1.1×	32 0.9×	59 3.9×	19 1.6×	43	988
Jusak Tandean Taiwan	17	1.0k 1.3×	403 1.1×	47 1.4×	7 0.5×	24 2.0×	66	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by John Ellis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ellis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ellis. The network helps show where John Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Ellis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Ellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Ellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Ellis. John Ellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Ellis, John, Keith A. Olive, Yudi Santoso, & Vassilis C. Spanos. (2005). Update on the direct detection of supersymmetric dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 71(9). 113 indexed citations

2.

Ellis, John & Douglas A. Ross. (2001). A light Higgs boson would invite supersymmetry. Physics Letters B. 506(3-4). 331–336. 29 indexed citations

3.

Davidson, Sacha & John Ellis. (1997). Flavor-dependent and basis-independent measures ofRviolation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 56(7). 4182–4193. 20 indexed citations

4.

Ellis, John, Graciela B. Gelmini, Jorge L. Lopez, D.V. Nanopoulos, & S. Sarkar. (1992). Astrophysical constraints on massive unstable neutral relic particles. Nuclear Physics B. 373(2). 399–437. 245 indexed citations

5.

Ellis, John, Yitzhak Frishman, & Marek Karliner. (1991). Constituent quarks as solitons. Physics Letters B. 272(3-4). 333–338. 7 indexed citations

6.

Ellis, John & G. L. Fogli. (1988). The mass of the top quark from electroweak radiative corrections. Physics Letters B. 213(4). 526–530. 49 indexed citations

7.

Ellis, John & H. Kowalski. (1984). Supersymmetric particles at the CERN collider. Nuclear Physics B. 246(2). 189–202. 44 indexed citations

8.

Ellis, John & Gary Steigman. (1980). Nonequilibrium in the very early universe. Physics Letters B. 89(2). 186–190. 37 indexed citations

9.

Ellis, John & R. L. Jaffe. (1974). Sum rule for deep-inelastic electroproduction from polarized protons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 9(5). 1444–1446. 279 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact