John E. Harkness

644 citations
5 papers · 356 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
    • Animal testing and alternatives
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
  • Equine top 10%

Papers in

Journals
Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice (2 papers)Psychiatria Danubina (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

John E. Harkness

5 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

John E. Harkness
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Small Animals 96
  • Equine 13
  • Animal Science and Zoology 51
  • Parasitology 15
  • Virology 10
Replace Onkar S. Atwal with:
Onkar S. Atwal Canada
Gabriel P McKeon United States
H Niedermüller Austria
K. Voigt Germany
H. van Herck Netherlands
Michael J Huerkamp United States
Richard E. Fish United States
Lang Cm United States
Edgar Ontsouka Switzerland
D. Sweasey United Arab Emirates
John E. Harkness relative to Onkar S. Atwal Canada Onkar S. Atwal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Onkar S. Atwal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Harkness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Harkness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Harkness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Harkness more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Harkness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Harkness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Harkness. The network helps show where John E. Harkness may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside John E. Harkness, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Harkness Line = papers co-authored together John E. Harkness links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
The biology and medicine of rabbits and rodents
1977318
2 198721
3
Swimming-puppy syndrome in a litter of German Shepherd pups.
19818
4 19948
5
Biología y clínica de conejos y roedores
19801

About John E. Harkness

John E. Harkness is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 5 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (2 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (1 paper) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (96 citations), Equine (13 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (51 citations), Parasitology (15 citations) and Virology (10 citations). John E. Harkness has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Joseph E. Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, Psychiatria Danubina, PubMed and Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact