John E. Greivenkamp

66 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

John E. Greivenkamp
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 489
  • Ophthalmology 215
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 348
  • Media Technology 107
  • Mechanical Engineering 309
Replace Daniel Malacara-Hernández with:
Daniel Malacara-Hernández Mexico
Guang-ming Dai United States
Paul R. Yoder United States
Daniel R. Neal United States
Luc Joannes Belgium
Santiago Royo Spain
Mette Owner-Petersen Sweden
Norbert Lindlein Germany
Guoguang Mu China
Zhishan Gao China
John E. Greivenkamp relative to Daniel Malacara-Hernández Mexico Daniel Malacara-Hernández's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Daniel Malacara-Hernández · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Greivenkamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Greivenkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Greivenkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Greivenkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Greivenkamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Greivenkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Greivenkamp. The network helps show where John E. Greivenkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Greivenkamp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Greivenkamp Line = papers co-authored together John E. Greivenkamp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004194
2 1995144
3 198783
4 199765
5 199559
6 199659
7 199948
8 200438
9 200437
10 199028
11 199625
12 199423
13 200122
14 199622
15 199722
16 199621
17 200820
18 200719
19 199617
20 199516

About John E. Greivenkamp

John E. Greivenkamp is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical measurement and interference techniques (36 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (35 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (17 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (13 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (11 papers), Advanced optical system design (11 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (489 citations), Ophthalmology (215 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (348 citations), Media Technology (107 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (309 citations). John E. Greivenkamp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Jim Schwiegerling, Joseph M. Miller, Robert O. Gappinger, Andrew E. Lowman, José Sasián, Takamasa Suzuki, Osami Sasaki, J. Schwiegerling, Robert W. Snyder and David A. Atchison. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Optics and Photonics News, Optometry and Vision Science and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact