John E. Cooper

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

John E. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 381
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Philosophy 116
  • Clinical Psychology 202
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 165
Replace Clyde W. Smith with:
Clyde W. Smith United States
Roberto Quartesan Italy
Peter L. Hays Canada
Lisbeth Uhrskov Sørensen Denmark
Yu‐Chen Kao Taiwan
M.M.A. Derix Netherlands
Daniel Röck Australia
Kelly Cervellione United States
Sandra Woolson United States
Keith H. Claypoole United States
John E. Cooper relative to Clyde W. Smith United States Clyde W. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Clyde W. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Cooper. The network helps show where John E. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Cooper Line = papers co-authored together John E. Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001356
2 2005175
3 199282
4 196971
5 196943
6 201443
7 197141
8 199634
9 201632
10 198928
11 200618
12
Comparison of two headless screw designs for fixation of capitellum fractures.
200318
13 199516
14 198616
15 201614
16 196814
17 201312
18 201410
19 198910
20 201510

About John E. Cooper

John E. Cooper is a scholar working on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Aerospace Engineering and Clinical Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (4 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (3 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (381 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Philosophy (116 citations), Clinical Psychology (202 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (165 citations). John E. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Barry J. Gurland, Robert Kendell, Helen L. Fisher, Joseph L. Fleiss, C.J. Tarrant, Swaran P. Singh, Tuhina Lloyd, Peter B. Jones, Norman Sartorius and Tibor Farkas. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Urology, American Journal of Psychiatry, The Prostate and Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact