John Deaton

13 total papers · 605 total citations
10 papers, 490 citations indexed

About

John Deaton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, John Deaton has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 490 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Ecology and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in John Deaton's work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers). John Deaton is often cited by papers focused on Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers). John Deaton collaborates with scholars based in United States. John Deaton's co-authors include Ry Young, Douglas K. Struck, Ing‐Nang Wang, Min Xu, Tae Hyun Park, Andreas Holzenburg, Rebecca White, Christos G. Savva, Jingchuan Sun and Joel Berry and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemistry and Journal of Bacteriology.

In The Last Decade

John Deaton

10 papers receiving 475 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
John Deaton	363	342	150	67	61	10	490
Ting Pang	330 0.9×	316 0.9×	138 0.9×	50 0.7×	52 0.9×	10	488
N Mutoh	383 1.1×	164 0.5×	233 1.6×	63 0.9×	33 0.5×	14	534
M L Parker	404 1.1×	160 0.5×	126 0.8×	70 1.0×	27 0.4×	15	550
Ana Saurı́	253 0.7×	152 0.4×	206 1.4×	145 2.2×	31 0.5×	13	531
Dorothee Andres	217 0.6×	254 0.7×	123 0.8×	36 0.5×	32 0.5×	11	435
Sergey Nazarov	253 0.7×	234 0.7×	119 0.8×	46 0.7×	37 0.6×	14	537
Erin Wall	285 0.8×	261 0.8×	180 1.2×	40 0.6×	64 1.0×	12	513
Björn Lindqvist	287 0.8×	181 0.5×	157 1.0×	26 0.4×	62 1.0×	17	503
C. Ahmad‐Zadeh	315 0.9×	192 0.6×	135 0.9×	27 0.4×	14 0.2×	11	491
Tony Ferrar	397 1.1×	96 0.3×	60 0.4×	96 1.4×	69 1.1×	14	540

Countries citing papers authored by John Deaton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Deaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Deaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Deaton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Deaton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Deaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Deaton. The network helps show where John Deaton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Deaton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Deaton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Deaton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Deaton. John Deaton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact