John de Csepel

22 total papers · 747 total citations
17 papers, 564 citations indexed

About

John de Csepel is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, John de Csepel has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 564 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Gastroenterology and 3 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in John de Csepel's work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers). John de Csepel is often cited by papers focused on Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers). John de Csepel collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Vietnam. John de Csepel's co-authors include Michel Gagner, Csaba Gajdos, Paul Ian Tartter, Alfons Pomp, Subhash Kini, Paolo Gentileschi, Theresa M. Quinn, Alfred Rademaker, George Hermann and Ira J. Bleiweiss and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Surgical Endoscopy and Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

In The Last Decade

John de Csepel

17 papers receiving 541 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
John de Csepel 386 95 94 85 78 17 564
Vaia Stafyla 390 1.0× 54 0.6× 94 1.0× 64 0.8× 55 0.7× 24 547
Brian E. Kadera 183 0.5× 175 1.8× 94 1.0× 13 0.2× 67 0.9× 23 549
Christopher R. Deig 144 0.4× 112 1.2× 99 1.1× 23 0.3× 17 0.2× 20 603
Simon Kuesters 519 1.3× 21 0.2× 179 1.9× 14 0.2× 119 1.5× 30 629
Dyanne Rampling 206 0.5× 38 0.4× 126 1.3× 53 0.6× 34 0.4× 20 590
William Williard 294 0.8× 72 0.8× 130 1.4× 127 1.5× 42 0.5× 14 516
Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo 275 0.7× 28 0.3× 224 2.4× 15 0.2× 58 0.7× 18 537
Oscar Tamburrini 150 0.4× 9 0.1× 189 2.0× 18 0.2× 31 0.4× 17 556
Yu‐Chung Wu 301 0.8× 35 0.4× 354 3.8× 42 0.5× 88 1.1× 21 645
Salvatore Napolitano 549 1.4× 55 0.6× 96 1.0× 31 0.4× 27 0.3× 33 669

Countries citing papers authored by John de Csepel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John de Csepel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John de Csepel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John de Csepel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John de Csepel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John de Csepel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John de Csepel. The network helps show where John de Csepel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John de Csepel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John de Csepel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John de Csepel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John de Csepel. John de Csepel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026