John D. Scarlett

432 citations
20 papers · 264 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers)Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (3 papers)Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers)
Partner nations
AustraliaUnited States

In The Last Decade

John D. Scarlett

19 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

John D. Scarlett
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Hematology 73
  • Oncology 63
  • Rheumatology 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 43
  • Surgery 32
Replace Jochem Koenig with:
Jochem Koenig Germany
Grace Monori United Kingdom
Olivia Turri Italy
Vincenzo Lombardo Italy
Camila Matzenbacher Bittar Brazil
W. Jeffrey Baker United States
Pierluigi Marradi Italy
Mette Saksø Mortensen Denmark
David Weidensaul United States
Marco Carletto Italy
John D. Scarlett relative to Jochem Koenig Germany Jochem Koenig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jochem Koenig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Scarlett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Scarlett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Scarlett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Scarlett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Scarlett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Scarlett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Scarlett. The network helps show where John D. Scarlett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Scarlett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Scarlett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Scarlett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Scarlett. John D. Scarlett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Prisoners of geography : ten maps that tell you everything you need to know about global politics
23
2 12
3
FLUDARABINE BASED COMBINATION THERAPY IS HIGHLY ACTIVE AS PRIMARY OR SALVAGE TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH WALDENSTROM MACROGLOBULINEMIA
1
4 1
5 7
6 6
7 0
8 13
9 10
10 10
11 16
12 2
13 3
14 51
15 9
16 12
17 16
18 10
19 31
20 31

About John D. Scarlett

John D. Scarlett is a scholar working on Hematology, Genetics and Oncology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (3 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (73 citations), Rheumatology (47 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (43 citations). John D. Scarlett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kerin O’Dea, Tim Marshall, Samuel F. Berkovic, Robert A. Zimmerman, D. Clarke, H. Miles Prince, James S. Wiley, Stephen Harrap, A. E. Doyle and E. Januszewicz. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Hypertension and Annals of Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026