John D. Osborne

1.2k total citations
33 papers, 831 citations indexed

About

John D. Osborne is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, John D. Osborne has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 831 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 6 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in John D. Osborne's work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (13 papers), Topic Modeling (5 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (5 papers). John D. Osborne is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (13 papers), Topic Modeling (5 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (5 papers). John D. Osborne collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. John D. Osborne's co-authors include Warren A. Kibbe, Simon Lin, Jared Flatow, Michelle Holko, Lihua Julie Zhu, Maria I. Danila, Rex L. Chisholm, Gang Feng, Ken B. Waites and Warren L. Simmons and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Bioinformatics and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

John D. Osborne

32 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

John D. Osborne
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Molecular Biology 428
  • Epidemiology 256
  • Virology 210
  • Microbiology 127
  • Genetics 118
Replace Jens Vindahl Kringelum with:
Jens Vindahl Kringelum Denmark
Kevin Galinsky United States
Michael Heck Germany
Anita Reinhardt France
Pavel Skums United States
Joshua B. Singer United Kingdom
Farah Shahid Pakistan
Michelle E. Gahan Australia
Urmila Kulkarni‐Kale India
Blaise Alako United Kingdom
Jens Vindahl Kringelum Denmark View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John D. Osborne
John D. Osborne · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John D. Osborne
John D. Osborne · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Osborne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Osborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Osborne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Osborne. The network helps show where John D. Osborne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Osborne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Osborne. John D. Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 1
4 5
5 7
6 20
7
Identification of Cancer Entities in Clinical Text Combining Transformers with Dictionary Features.
1
8
AllergyMap: An Open Source Corpus of Allergy Mention Normalizations.
1
9
Identification of Gout Flares in Chief Complaint Text Using Natural Language Processing.
9
10 43
11 59
12 16
13 8
14 6
15 206
16 41
17 18
18 24
19 23
20
Congenital, Perinatal, and Neonatal Infections
12

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026