Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review
2001790 citationsMarc Orlitzky, John D. Benjaminprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Benjamin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Benjamin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Benjamin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Benjamin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Benjamin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Benjamin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Benjamin. The network helps show where John D. Benjamin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Benjamin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Benjamin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Benjamin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Benjamin. John D. Benjamin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Benjamin, John D., Peter Chinloy, G. Donald Jud, & Daniel T. Winkler. (2007). Do Some People Work Harder Than Others? Evidence from Real Estate Brokerage. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Benjamin, John D., Peter Chinloy, G. Donald Jud, & Daniel T. Winkler. (2006). Technology and Real Estate Brokerage Firm Financial Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
Benjamin, John D., Peter Chinloy, & G. Donald Jud. (2004). Real Estate Versus Financial Wealth in Consumption. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
Ambrose, Brent W., John D. Benjamin, & Peter Chinloy. (2002). Bank and Nonbank Lenders and the Commercial Mortgage Market. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Benjamin, John D., G. Donald Jud, & G. Stacy Sirmans. (2001). Real Estate Brokerage and the Housing Market: An Annotated Bibliography. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Benjamin, John D., Peter Chinloy, & G. Stacy Sirmans. (1999). Housing Vouchers, Tenant Quality and Apartment Values. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
14.
Benjamin, John D., G. Donald Jud, & Daniel T. Winkler. (1999). The Supply Adjustment Process in Retail Space Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Ambrose, Brent W., John D. Benjamin, & Peter Chinloy. (1998). Credit Restrictions and the Market for Commercial Real Estate Loans. SSRN Electronic Journal.
16.
Benjamin, John D. & G. Stacy Sirmans. (1997). Mass Transportation, Apartment Rent and Property Values. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
Sirmans, Stacy, C. F. Sirmans, & John D. Benjamin. (1990). Rental Concessions and Property Values. Journal of Real Estate Research. 5(1). 141–151.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.